the news now
This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

BCI Co-Chairman Demands Resignation of Chairman Manan Kumar Mishra Amid Allegations of Mismanagement

2 sources · India

Who reported this

  • The Indian Express India · Centre · Indian Express Group (Goenka family)
  • Hindustan Times India · Centre-right · HT Media (KK Birla group)

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Every source for this story reports from India.

Bar Council of India (BCI) Co-Chairman and senior advocate Y R Sadasiva Reddy has called for the immediate resignation of BCI Chairman Manan Kumar Mishra. In a letter dated August 22, Reddy alleged that Mishra has engaged in mismanagement, nepotism, and the diversion of funds. Specifically, Reddy claimed that a new trust, BCI Trust PEARL First, was created to replace a previous institution and that 150 crore rupees in BCI funds were transferred to it. He further alleged that some law colleges were required to make contributions ranging from 25 lakh to 1 crore rupees to this trust for approvals or renewals.

Reddy also raised concerns regarding staff appointments, asserting that several employees are personally connected to Mishra and that these appointments lacked a transparent recruitment process. Another point of contention is a directive issued by Mishra on August 13, which asked state Bar councils not to enrol students from the 2026 batch of NALSAR University of Law. This directive followed a campaign opposing the invitation of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant to the university convocation. While Mishra later withdrew the circular, Reddy argued the action was a reprisal for independence of thought and was issued without proper Council deliberation.

Chairman Manan Kumar Mishra has dismissed these allegations as personally and politically motivated, stating they have no substance. He challenged Reddy to prove the claims and asserted that more than two thirds of BCI members continue to support him. Mishra also defended the BCI Trust, stating its accounts are audited annually and made available in the public domain.

Beyond the internal dispute, Mishra's tenure has been challenged in the Supreme Court by advocate Yogamaya MG. The petition argues that Mishra's continuous hold on the office since 2012 violates BCI Rules, which prescribe a two year limit for the Chairman's term. The petition also questions Mishra's political activities, noting his 2024 nomination to the Rajya Sabha by the BJP. Meanwhile, the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) has supported the calls for resignation, leading to a public exchange where Mishra condemned the party for referring to lawyers as legal cockroaches.

How each side framed it

Centre
The coverage focused on the specific procedural failures regarding the NALSAR directive and the detailed allegations of fund diversion.
Centre-right
The reporting emphasized the political motivations behind the accusations and highlighted the legal challenges to the Chairman's tenure in the Supreme Court.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.