Debate Intensifies Over Classification and Influence of Germany's AfD

The Alternative for Germany (AfD) continues to face significant scrutiny regarding its ideological classification and internal stability. In Hessen, the state office for the protection of the constitution has classified the party as a suspected case of right wing extremism, a designation recently confirmed by the Wiesbaden Administrative Court. The court cited efforts against the free democratic basic order and specific statements from party members, such as Gerhard Schenk, who questioned the validity of German passports and called for the remigration of German citizens. While some party leaders like Lambrou claim the party is moderate and professional, former members and critics argue that the party has rotted from below as more radical individuals have joined local associations. Political scientists note that the AfD has evolved from a right wing democratic party with an extremist minority into a right wing extremist party with a democratic minority. The party is also attempting to expand its voter base by courting low income workers who previously supported the SPD. Different perspectives exist on how to label the group: some describe it as right wing populist due to its opposition between the people and the elites, while others use terms like völkisch to describe its focus on ethnic purity. In Saxony Anhalt, candidates have used a strategy of positive atmospheres during campaigns, which some critics describe as intentional voter deception.