the news now
This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

FIFA Leadership Reaffirms Support for Gianni Infantino Following World Cup Investment Crisis

18 sources across 14 countries · 1 of them is linked to a state

Who reported this

  • Le Monde France · Centre-left · Fonds pour l'independance de la presse
  • Le Monde Afrique France · Centre-left · Fonds pour l'independance de la presse
  • France 24 France · Centre · Public · France Medias Monde (French state holding)
  • Der Spiegel Germany · Centre-left · ~50% staff-owned
  • Frankfurter Allgemeine Germany · Centre-right · FAZIT-Stiftung (foundation)
  • Al-Monitor United States · Centre · Jamal Daniel
  • Associated Press United States · Centre · Non-profit news cooperative
  • Telex Hungary · Centre · Reader-funded, staff-owned
  • Tempo English Indonesia · Centre-left · PT Tempo Inti Media
  • ANSA Italy · Centre · Publisher cooperative
  • NRC Netherlands · Centre · Mediahuis
  • TheCable Nigeria · Centre · Cable Newspaper Ltd
  • Aftenposten Norway · Centre-right · Schibsted, Tinius Trust foundation
  • Al Jazeera Qatar · Centre-left · State-affiliated · Qatari government funded
  • The Korea Herald South Korea · Centre-right · Herald Corporation (Yeongpoong Group)
  • El Pais Spain · Centre-left · Grupo PRISA
  • Taipei Times Taiwan · Centre-left · Liberty Times Group
  • BBC News United Kingdom · Centre · Public · Licence fee, royal charter

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

FIFA leadership has reaffirmed its full support for President Gianni Infantino following a crisis meeting in Rabat, Morocco. The meeting was convened after a proposal to sell a 20 percent stake in a new commercial rights entity to private investors, which would have raised approximately 4.2 billion dollars, triggered a fierce international backlash and was subsequently withdrawn on August 1. In a statement, FIFA noted that Secretary General Mattias Grafstrom and members of the management board expressed their unrestricted support for Infantino, citing him as the only official elected by the 211 member associations. Infantino reciprocated this support for the administration and the Secretary General.

FIFA issued an apology to its Council members and member associations for errors made during the process. The organization acknowledged that the proposal should have been handled differently and that members should not have felt excluded. FIFA has promised a review of the process and a subsequent report. Despite the apology, the organization stated it would no longer tolerate attacks on its integrity or governance and would take necessary measures to protect its reputation.

The controversy drew sharp criticism from several major football bodies. UEFA, the European governing body, stated it had lost confidence in Infantino's leadership and previously threatened to boycott competitions. CONCACAF and the Asian Football Confederation also expressed criticism over the lack of consultation. Internally, the crisis was marked by a memo from Secretary General Mattias Grafstrom describing the events as sad and reproachable. Other internal dissent included the resignation of senior adviser Carlos Cordeiro and public distancing from the plan by FIFA's chief of global football development, Arsene Wenger. Former Portugal international Luis Figo also called for Infantino's resignation.

Additional tensions emerged following a report by The Times claiming Infantino promised Morocco the 2030 World Cup final, a claim FIFA has denied as false and misleading. The proposal also faced scrutiny due to the involvement of a company with family links to U.S. President Donald Trump. While European federations have largely withdrawn their support, Infantino continues to maintain backing from several associations in Africa and Asia.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
These outlets emphasized the political survival of Infantino and framed the event as a crisis of legitimacy and trust.
Centre
These outlets focused on the factual sequence of the crisis meeting, the official apologies, and the balance of support and opposition.
Centre-right
These outlets highlighted the specific threats to FIFA's reputation and the potential for the crisis to end Infantino's tenure.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.