Former White House Aide Fined for Insider Trading on Trump Speeches
3 sources across 3 countries · Hong Kong · United Kingdom · United States
Who reported this
- South China Morning Post
- Reuters
- CNN
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
Gabriel Perez, a former White House teleprompter operator, has agreed to pay a $65,000 fine and forfeit over $107,000 in profits to settle an insider trading case brought by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The CFTC determined that Perez used nonpublic information and misappropriated material to place 49 trades on the prediction market Kalshi, winning 39 of them. These trades focused on mention markets, where users bet on specific words or phrases a public figure will use during an event. The bets involved several occasions, including the State of the Union address, the National Prayer Breakfast, and various rallies.
As a longtime aide who worked with Donald Trump for a decade, Perez was often one of the last people to see the president's remarks before they were delivered. The CFTC stated that Perez breached his duty of trust and confidentiality to the U.S. government. However, the agency provided a substantial discount on the fine due to his exemplary cooperation with the probe. In addition to the financial penalties, Perez received a three year trading ban from Kalshi. The prediction company stated that it caught the prohibited activity and reported it to federal authorities.
Reports on the severity of the penalty vary by political perspective. A center left source highlighted criticism from a former CFTC commissioner who argued the small fine was a missed opportunity to deter insider trading at the highest level of government. A center right source focused on the factual details of the settlement and the specific nature of the mention market contracts. The White House previously stated that President Trump considered the actions a disgrace.
How each side framed it
- Centre-left
- This perspective emphasized the inadequacy of the fine and the breach of trust at the highest level of government.
- Centre-right
- This perspective focused on the mechanics of the betting and the factual outcome of the settlement.
Sources
- Centre-left CNN: Trump’s longtime teleprompter operator to pay $65,000 fine to settle insider-trading case
- Centre Reuters: CFTC fines former White House aide $172,000 for trading on Trump speech information - Reuters
- Centre-right South China Morning Post: White House teleprompter operator fined, forfeits winnings for betting on Trump’s words
100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.