the news now
This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Meta Ordered to Pay $567 Million in New Mexico Child Safety Ruling

18 sources across 14 countries · 2 of them are linked to a state

Who reported this

  • The Guardian United Kingdom · Centre-left · Scott Trust Limited
  • BBC News United Kingdom · Centre · Public · Licence fee, royal charter
  • Reuters United Kingdom · Centre · Thomson Reuters Corporation
  • Le Monde France · Centre-left · Fonds pour l'independance de la presse
  • France 24 France · Centre · Public · France Medias Monde (French state holding)
  • Der Spiegel Germany · Centre-left · ~50% staff-owned
  • Frankfurter Allgemeine Germany · Centre-right · FAZIT-Stiftung (foundation)
  • The Daily Star Bangladesh · Centre · Mediaworld Ltd
  • Folha de S.Paulo Brazil · Centre · Grupo Folha (Frias family)
  • El Tiempo Colombia · Centre-right · Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo (Grupo Aval)
  • South China Morning Post Hong Kong · Centre-right · Alibaba Group
  • Tempo English Indonesia · Centre-left · PT Tempo Inti Media
  • The Jerusalem Post Israel · Centre-right · Mirkaei Tikshoret (Eli Azur)
  • The Japan Times Japan · Centre · News2u Holdings
  • Aftenposten Norway · Centre-right · Schibsted, Tinius Trust foundation
  • Al Jazeera Qatar · Centre-left · State-affiliated · Qatari government funded
  • The Straits Times Singapore · Centre-right · State-affiliated · SPH Media Trust; management shares under the NPPA
  • Daily Maverick South Africa · Centre-left · Reader-funded

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

A judge in New Mexico has ordered Meta to pay $567 million to address harms caused to children on its platforms. This ruling follows a March jury verdict that ordered the company to pay $375 million, bringing the total liability in the state to $942 million. Judge Bryan Biedscheid ruled that Meta created a public nuisance, comparing the psychological harm and sexual exploitation of children to pollution from a factory. Meta has stated that it disagrees with the ruling and intends to appeal.

Approximately $420 million of the new fund will be dedicated to mental health treatment for young people. The remaining funds will be used for prevention, screening, and awareness programs over a five year period. The judge also ordered Meta to implement several safety measures for users under 18 in New Mexico. These include a monthly usage limit of 90 hours for Facebook and Instagram, restrictions on notifications during school hours and late at night, and the hiding of like counts. Additionally, the court ordered tighter controls on adult contact with minors, safeguards for AI chatbots to prevent romantic or sexualized interactions, and improved handling of child sexual abuse reports.

While the judge imposed these restrictions, he denied some requests from the state. He declined to mandate strict age verification for new users, citing federal privacy laws and the potential to unfairly disadvantage Meta compared to competitors. He also declined to ban infinite scrolling or algorithmic recommendations, noting these features may be protected by the First Amendment and telecommunications laws.

This case is part of a broader wave of litigation across the United States. More than 30 states and over 1,300 school districts have filed similar lawsuits against social media companies. New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez described the decision as a victory for parents and a blueprint for other jurisdictions confronting the mental health crisis among youth.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
These outlets emphasized the systemic failure of Meta to protect children and the historical significance of the victory for families.
Centre
These outlets focused on the legal specifics of the public nuisance ruling and the financial breakdown of the fund.
Centre-right
These outlets highlighted the company's intent to appeal and the legal constraints that prevented the judge from ordering stricter age verification.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.