the news now
This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Russia's Supreme Court Bars Antiwar Yabloko Party from Parliamentary Elections

3 sources across 2 countries · Latvia · Germany

Who reported this

  • Meduza Latvia · Centre-left · Crowdfunded; exiled Russian newsroom
  • Novaya Gazeta Europe Latvia · Centre-left · Crowdfunded; exiled Russian newsroom
  • Deutsche Welle Germany · Centre · Public · German federal public-law corporation

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Russia's Supreme Court has disqualified the liberal Yabloko party from the State Duma elections scheduled for September 2026. The decision follows a lawsuit filed by the pro-Kremlin Rodina party, which accused Yabloko of copyright infringement, illegal foreign funding, and extremism. While the court did not rule on whether Yabloko's antiwar positions were extremist, it upheld several other claims. Specifically, the court found that Yabloko violated copyright by using an image generated by ChatGPT, polling results from the Levada Center, and specific Soviet-era phrases. The court also ruled that the party engaged in illegal campaign financing by receiving donations from individuals who had received funds from foreign sources and by benefiting from social media support on blocked platforms.

Supporters of Yabloko gathered in front of the Supreme Court to protest the decision, where security services warned them of potential arrests or military enlistment. Yabloko leader Nikolai Rybakov stated that the party would appeal the ruling and claimed to have a plan to participate in the elections regardless. Prominent opposition figures, including Yulia Navalnaya, argued that the Kremlin blocked the party because it feared the visibility of antiwar sentiment among the Russian public.

Center-left sources frame the event as a calculated political experiment by the Kremlin, suggesting the party was initially allowed to register to test public appetite for peace before being shut down. Center sources frame the event as a sign of the political system exposing itself through the removal of a peace platform without real grounds.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
These sources frame the disqualification as a strategic move by the Kremlin to test and then suppress antiwar sentiment.
Centre
This source frames the event as a manifestation of the Kremlin's fear of organized antiwar opposition.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.