the news now
This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Supreme Court Issues Notice to Centre Over Suitability of Jantar Mantar for Protests

3 sources · India

Who reported this

  • The Hindu India · Centre-left · Kasturi & Sons (family-owned)
  • The Indian Express India · Centre · Indian Express Group (Goenka family)
  • Hindustan Times India · Centre-right · HT Media (KK Birla group)

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Every source for this story reports from India.

The Supreme Court of India has issued a notice to the central government to consider a public interest litigation (PIL) arguing that Jantar Mantar is no longer a suitable site for public protests. A three judge bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant stated that the plea raising concerns over ingress and egress issues and the supply of medical essentials is important. The court has asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to seek instructions from the government regarding the request for an alternative protest venue. The petitioner, Satish Chand Kaushik, suggested that a larger and more secure ground, such as Ramlila Maidan, should be designated as the principal venue to avoid traffic snarls and security risks in central Delhi. During the proceedings, the court also addressed concerns regarding a proposed march by the Aam Aadmi Party to the Prime Minister's residence, with the Chief Justice stating that authorities would handle the event appropriately. Separately, the court agreed to examine a plea seeking accountability for the organizers of a July 20 Parliament march related to the NEET question paper leak. This protest, led by the Cockroach Janta Party and climate activist Sonam Wangchuk, resulted in clashes with Delhi Police involving tear gas and lathi charges. A retired Indian Air Force officer appearing in that matter urged the court to implement a uniform national policy for arrests and suggested that young protesters using derogatory language be sentenced to community service instead of facing FIRs.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
The coverage emphasized the legal tension between the right to peaceful dissent and the right of commuters to move freely, providing historical context on the court's balancing act.
Centre
The report balanced the legal proceedings regarding the protest venue with the specific demands for accountability and community service for young protesters.
Centre-right
The framing highlighted the chaos and disruption caused by the NEET protests and included details about the government's potential use of Aadhaar data to identify protesters.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.