the news now
This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

United States Imposes New Sanctions on Cuban State Entities and Officials

4 sources across 4 countries · Argentina · Chile · Qatar · United Kingdom · 1 of them is linked to a state

Who reported this

  • La Nacion Argentina · Centre-right · Saguier family
  • La Tercera Chile · Centre-right · Copesa (Saieh family)
  • Al Jazeera Qatar · Centre-left · State-affiliated · Qatari government funded
  • Reuters United Kingdom · Centre · Thomson Reuters Corporation

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

The United States government announced new sanctions on Thursday targeting nine Cuban state companies and three officials. The measures, issued by the Treasury and State Departments, target entities in the mining, metals, and construction sectors, including the Ministry of Construction and the mining group GEOMINSAL. Additionally, the U.S. sanctioned leadership from the Cuban Institute of Friendship with the Peoples (ICAP), including its president, Fernando González Llort, who was previously imprisoned in the U.S. for espionage.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that the sanctions are intended to disrupt a network used to radicalize and corrupt American citizens and to cut off funding for the Cuban government. The U.S. administration also reinforced rules prohibiting Americans from conducting transactions with state controlled companies during travel to the island. This follows an incident where U.S. citizens returning from Cuba were briefly detained at the Miami airport for review of their electronic devices.

Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez rejected the measures, arguing that Washington is deliberately attempting to damage the Cuban economy and prevent the government from providing basic services, such as medicine and food, to the population. Cuba is currently experiencing a severe economic crisis characterized by fuel shortages and energy blackouts. These conditions were exacerbated by a fuel blockade following the removal of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela, which had previously provided subsidized oil to the island.

Outlets with a center right lean framed the event as a necessary application of pressure against a regime that uses subversive tactics and front groups. In contrast, a center left outlet framed the sanctions as part of a maximum pressure campaign designed to destabilize the economy and topple the government, warning that such actions could trigger a humanitarian crisis.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
Framed the sanctions as a destructive effort to pummel the Cuban economy and force regime change.
Centre
Presented the sanctions as a factual expansion of U.S. economic restrictions on the mining and construction sectors.
Centre-right
Framed the sanctions as a strategic move to stop subversive activities and cut off funding for the Cuban regime.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.