the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Australia Proposes Legislation to Allow Users to Disable Social Media Algorithms

3 sources across 3 countries · Hong Kong · Qatar · United Kingdom · 1 of them is linked to a state

Who reported this

  • South China Morning Post Hong Kong · Centre-right · Alibaba Group
  • Al Jazeera Qatar · Centre-left · State-affiliated · Qatari government funded
  • BBC News United Kingdom · Centre · Public · Licence fee, royal charter

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

The Australian government plans to introduce draft legislation this week that would require social media companies to allow users to turn off the algorithms that tailor their content feeds. Communications Minister Anika Wells stated that the proposed digital duty of care laws aim to provide Australians with more choice over what they see online. Under the plan, tech firms such as Meta, Google, and TikTok could face substantial penalties if they do not provide the option to disable these algorithms. The government is currently seeking expert advice on whether users would be required to opt in or opt out of algorithmic feeds.

Opposition leader Angus Taylor expressed skepticism regarding the proposal, suggesting that the move could be an attempt by the government to censor social media. Minister Wells denied these claims, stating that the legislation is about identifying and mitigating risks on platforms rather than censorship. The proposed law is also expected to place an onus on platforms to stop the sharing of harmful content, including illegal pornography and videos promoting disordered eating.

This move follows a world first ban on social media for children under 16 introduced in December. However, reports indicate that many under 16s continue to use these platforms, and no tech firms have been fined for failing to enforce the ban so far. Some advocates have urged the government to implement an opt in system to prevent tech firms from bypassing reforms, arguing that algorithms can expose young people to misogynistic material and fuel sexual violence.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
The center left outlet emphasized the addictive nature of algorithms and the broader context of protecting children from online harm.
Centre
The center outlet focused on the legislative process and the specific arguments regarding safety and censorship.
Centre-right
The center right outlet highlighted the opposition's doubts regarding the government's ability to enforce the law.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.