Business Leaders Express Support for Milei at Council of the Americas Forum
2 sources · Argentina
Who reported this
- elDiarioAR
- La Nacion
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
Every source for this story reports from Argentina.
The annual Council of the Americas meeting took place at the Hotel Alvear, where business leaders and political figures gathered to discuss Argentina's economic trajectory. Mario Grinman, president of the Argentine Chamber of Commerce and Services, provided an explicit endorsement of President Javier Milei's government. Grinman acknowledged that some companies have closed and jobs have been lost, but he stated that such costs are worth it to transform the country for future generations. He highlighted growth in Patagonia's hydrocarbons, mineral exploitation in the cordillera, and potential investment in artificial intelligence as benefits of increased economic freedom.
Susan Segal, head of Americas Society and the Council of the Americas, also supported the current direction. She emphasized that fiscal control and reforms are essential to attract foreign investment, particularly in critical minerals and data centers. Meanwhile, other discussions at the event and in related political circles focused on the sustainability of these changes. Diego Santilli defended the government's economic path and its strategic alignment with the United States. In a separate context, former Treasury Minister Hernán Lacunza warned about credit delinquency affecting over five million people, suggesting the government implement tools to facilitate debt restructuring without using state funds.
Reporting on the event differed based on political perspective. A center left source focused on the social cost of the adjustment, highlighting Grinman's admission that job losses are the price of transformation. A center right source framed the event around the strategic alignment with the United States and the broader political debate over how to ensure the irreversibility of the current economic shift.
How each side framed it
- Centre-left
- Focused on the admission of job losses and the social cost associated with the government's economic transformation.
- Centre-right
- Emphasized the strategic alignment with the United States and the necessity of securing the current economic direction against future political shifts.
Sources
93% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.