the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

DAP Votes to Remain in Anwar Ibrahim's Ruling Alliance

2 sources across 2 countries · Hong Kong · Malaysia

Who reported this

  • South China Morning Post Hong Kong · Centre-right · Alibaba Group
  • Malaysiakini Malaysia · Centre-left · Mkini Dotcom, subscriber-funded

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

The Democratic Action Party (DAP) voted on Sunday to remain in Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's ruling alliance, ensuring the stability of the administration until its term ends in early 2028. Nearly 90 percent of the more than 2,200 delegates at the party congress supported the decision. DAP Secretary General Anthony Loke stated that the mandate allows leaders to continue pursuing the reform agenda and changes promised in the Pakatan Harapan manifesto. A center-left source focused on a delegate's demand for reforms, such as the championing of Ombudsman Malaysia, as a condition for staying. Meanwhile, a center-right source framed the decision as a risk to the party's credibility, noting that analysts believe the DAP must secure concrete reforms before the next general election to avoid being seen as merely providing numbers for the prime minister.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
The reporting emphasized internal party demands for specific reforms like the Ombudsman Malaysia.
Centre-right
The reporting framed the decision as a strategic risk that could erode the party's credibility if reforms are not achieved.

Sources

83% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.