the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Elon Musk Documentary Premieres at Venice Film Festival Amid Hush Money Allegations

2 sources across 2 countries · Argentina · Germany

Who reported this

  • elDiarioAR Argentina · Centre-left · Newsroom-majority owned, membership funded
  • Frankfurter Allgemeine Germany · Centre-right · FAZIT-Stiftung (foundation)

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

A nearly four hour documentary about Elon Musk directed by Alex Gibney premiered at the Venice Film Festival. During the event, Ashley St. Clair, a former partner of Musk, alleged that she was offered 40 million dollars to sign a confidentiality agreement to prevent her from revealing that Musk is the father of her child. St. Clair also claimed that Musk sent her a text message stating they needed a legion of children before a civil war. Musk has previously described the film project as a hit piece and did not provide a statement regarding the hush money allegations.

The documentary examines Musk's rise to power and his influence on global politics and technology. It explores his ties to the US defense apparatus and the US space agency, as well as the role of his associates in a cost cutting initiative under President Donald Trump. The film suggests that Musk's financial support for Republicans was driven by self interest, citing a 2024 interview where Musk expressed fear of imprisonment if Trump lost the election. The production also addresses his business history, including his relationship with Tesla co founder Martin Eberhard.

Reporting on the event differed based on political lean. A center left source framed the film as a warning about a nuclear bomb for democracy, emphasizing a dangerous right wing agenda and the human cost of Musk's policies. A center right source focused more on the specific allegations of hush money and the filmmaker's questioning of Musk's self presentation and business claims.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
Framed the documentary as a terrifying revelation of a deliberate plan to install far right governments and manipulate democracy.
Centre-right
Framed the event around the controversy of the hush money allegations and the film's critique of Musk's influence and business tactics.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.