the news now
This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Federal Judge Blocks New York's $75 Billion Climate Superfund Law

2 sources across 2 countries · Israel · United Kingdom

Who reported this

  • The Jerusalem Post Israel · Centre-right · Mirkaei Tikshoret (Eli Azur)
  • Reuters United Kingdom · Centre · Thomson Reuters Corporation

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

A federal judge ruled on Monday that New York cannot enforce a 2024 state law that would have required fossil fuel companies to pay $75 billion over 25 years into a climate change fund. Chief US District Judge Brenda Sannes ruled that the state measure is preempted by federal law, specifically the Clean Air Act. Sannes stated that the federal act gives the Environmental Protection Agency authority to regulate carbon dioxide emissions and does not authorize states to create emissions compensation schemes. She noted that the law conflicted with the need for uniform national energy and environmental policy.

The New York law would have required companies responsible for 1 billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions between 2000 and 2018 to contribute $3 billion annually starting in 2028. The funds were intended for infrastructure projects to protect communities from extreme heat and flooding. The decision follows a lawsuit brought by 22 Republican state attorneys general and industry groups, including the US Chamber of Commerce. The US Department of Justice under President Donald Trump also supported the challenge.

West Virginia Attorney General JB McCuskey, a Republican, described the law as a money grab by elites. Conversely, a spokesperson for Democratic Governor Kathy Hochul stated that taxpayers should not have to pay for damages caused by polluters. The governor's office is currently reviewing the decision to determine next steps.

How each side framed it

Centre
The center outlet focused on the legal outcome and the specific ruling of the judge.
Centre-right
The center-right outlet emphasized the opposition from Republican attorneys general and the potential for job losses in the energy sector.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.