the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

FIFA Accuses UEFA of Smear Campaign Amid Legal Battle Over World Cup Investor Plan

9 sources across 7 countries

Who reported this

  • Der Spiegel Germany · Centre-left · ~50% staff-owned
  • Deutsche Welle Germany · Centre · Public · German federal public-law corporation
  • The Guardian United Kingdom · Centre-left · Scott Trust Limited
  • BBC News United Kingdom · Centre · Public · Licence fee, royal charter
  • Folha de S.Paulo Brazil · Centre · Grupo Folha (Frias family)
  • Le Monde France · Centre-left · Fonds pour l'independance de la presse
  • Telex Hungary · Centre · Reader-funded, staff-owned
  • The Japan Times Japan · Centre · News2u Holdings
  • Dawn Pakistan · Centre-left · Pakistan Herald Publications (Haroon family)

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

FIFA has accused UEFA of conducting a smear campaign and a fishing expedition after the European governing body sought documents from United States courts regarding a failed plan to sell stakes in the World Cup to private investors. The dispute centers on the FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE), a proposal unveiled in July that would have allowed private investors to acquire commercial rights. While FIFA quickly abandoned the plan following a widespread backlash, UEFA is now seeking evidence to support potential criminal proceedings in Switzerland against FIFA President Gianni Infantino for alleged criminal mismanagement.

UEFA filed requests in several United States states to obtain documents and testimony from FIFA and its partners, including Joshua Kushner and his firm, Thrive Capital. Kushner, the brother of Donald Trump's son in law, was expected to be the lead investor in the deal. FIFA has responded by asking United States judges to contest or dismiss these requests. FIFA argues that UEFA has no legal standing to demand internal documents because no criminal proceedings currently exist and UEFA has suffered no financial loss. FIFA further claims that UEFA is illegally bypassing Swiss courts to access sensitive and confidential information.

In its court filings, FIFA asserts that UEFA's opposition to the FFE was economically motivated. FIFA claims the plan would have strengthened football in developing nations, thereby increasing global competition and reducing UEFA's market power. Conversely, UEFA described the proposal as a shady and opaque backroom deal intended to benefit a small circle of insiders.

This legal conflict occurs as Gianni Infantino faces mounting pressure regarding his leadership. While he hopes to be re elected for a fourth term in March 2027, he faces opposition from UEFA and two other continental confederations, CONCACAF and the AFC. Victor Montagliani, the president of CONCACAF, is widely viewed as a likely challenger to Infantino. Joshua Kushner recently expressed regret over the FFE, stating that he and his partners failed to appreciate the political dynamics of global football.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
These outlets emphasized the accusations of criminal mismanagement and the potential for personal profit by Infantino and his associates.
Centre
These outlets focused on the legal arguments and the institutional power struggle between the two organizations.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.