1 August 2026
the news now

Former AAP Councillor Tahir Hussain and Four Others Sentenced to Life Imprisonment for Murder of IB Officer

3 sources · India

Who reported this

  • The Hindu India · Centre-left · Kasturi & Sons (family-owned)
  • The Indian Express India · Centre · Indian Express Group (Goenka family)
  • Hindustan Times India · Centre-right · HT Media (KK Birla group)

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • Hatched: the outlet is state-affiliated or state-controlled

Lean is where the outlet sits in its OWN country's politics, never on one global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

Ownership is disclosed, never rated.

Every source for this story reports from India.

A Delhi court on Friday sentenced former Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) councillor Tahir Hussain and four others to life imprisonment for the murder of Intelligence Bureau officer Ankit Sharma during the 2020 Northeast Delhi riots. Additional Sessions Judge Praveen Singh of Karkardooma Court described the crime as horrendous and sickening, noting that the victim was targeted solely because of his religion and that his body was dragged like an animal before being thrown into a drain. Despite the brutality, the court rejected the Delhi Police plea for the death penalty. The judge stated that the prosecution failed to prove the convicts were beyond reformation or that they possessed a violent disposition that would make them a menace to society if they remained alive in prison. The court also rejected allegations that Hussain used his house to stockpile weapons and petrol bombs, citing a lack of evidence. For the four other convicts, the court considered their lack of education a mitigating factor, suggesting they were more susceptible to communal propaganda and misinformation. Following the verdict, political tensions flared between the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the AAP. The BJP hailed the ruling as a triumph of justice and accused the AAP of sheltering criminals. In response, the AAP stated that Hussain had been expelled from the party and claimed he was actually working for the BJP as part of a political strategy. Outlets with a center-left lean focused on the political war of words and the AAP's counter-claims that the BJP benefited from the riots. Outlets with a center-right lean emphasized the court's description of the murder as a rarest of the rare case in terms of brutality. Center-leaning coverage provided the most detailed account of the judge's legal reasoning regarding the rejection of the death penalty.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
Focused heavily on the political conflict and the AAP's claims that Tahir Hussain was an asset of the BJP.
Centre
Provided a detailed legal breakdown of the sentencing and the court's reasoning for denying the death penalty.
Centre-right
Highlighted the extreme brutality of the crime and the court's classification of the murder as a rarest of the rare case.

Sources

Faithfulness score: 0.90 (fraction of claims supported by the sources, self-judged).