the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Former Plus Ultra Executives to Testify Regarding Former Spanish Prime Minister Zapatero

2 sources across 2 countries · Argentina · Spain

Who reported this

  • Infobae Argentina · Centre-right · Daniel Hadad
  • El Pais Spain · Centre-left · Grupo PRISA

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Former executives of the airline Plus Ultra are scheduled to testify before the Audiencia Nacional regarding the involvement of former Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero in a state loan rescue. Julio Martínez Sola, the former president of Plus Ultra, and Roberto Roselli, the former CEO, are appearing before Judge José Luis Calama after submitting written statements implicating Zapatero. The investigation centers on a 53 million euro public loan granted to the airline in 2021.

According to reports, Martínez Sola alleged in writing that he received a call from Zapatero via a hidden number on April 30, 2020, to discuss the airline's financial situation and the need for an ICO credit. The investigation is also examining claims that a 1 percent commission, totaling 530,000 euros, was paid through a company owned by Julio Martínez Martínez, who is described as a friend and alleged proxy for Zapatero. The judge is investigating whether Zapatero led a network of influence to benefit Plus Ultra and other companies.

Reporting on the event differs in focus based on political lean. The center left source frames the testimony as a corroboration of versions where the executives admit they do not know exactly who Zapatero influenced. In contrast, the center right source frames the event as a legal pursuit of Zapatero for his alleged pretension to collect payment for mediating the state loan.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
The reporting emphasizes the ambiguity of the executives' knowledge regarding the specific nature of the influence.
Centre-right
The reporting emphasizes the specific allegations of financial corruption and the existence of a network of influence.

Sources

89% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.