India Opens Conventional Missile Production to Private Sector
2 sources across 2 countries · India · Qatar · 1 of them is linked to a state
Who reported this
- Hindustan Times
- Al Jazeera
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
India's Defence Minister Rajnath Singh has approved the transfer of technology developed by the state run Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) to the private sector for the production of all conventional missile systems. The Ministry of Defence stated that the objective is to enhance domestic manufacturing capabilities, strengthen the defence industrial base, and reduce dependence on imports. This policy shift ends the monopoly previously held by government run firms, such as Bharat Dynamics, and allows private companies to compete for production rights based on technical qualifications and regulatory requirements.
Specific projects identified for private sector involvement include the Long Range Land Attack Cruise Missile with a target strike range of 1,000 to 1,500 kilometers and the Pralay quasi ballistic tactical missile with a range of 150 to 500 kilometers. Other systems slated for private production include the Astra Mark I and Mark II air to air missiles, as well as various anti radiation, hypersonic, and anti ship missiles. Companies such as Adani Defence Systems and Technologies Limited, Bharat Forge, and ICOMM are among those expected to be involved.
Reporting on the move differs in framing based on political lean. A center left source frames the decision as a significant shift toward a military industrial complex and raises questions regarding security risks and the actual capacity of private firms to meet military reliability standards. Conversely, a center right source frames the move as a dramatic scaling up of production numbers that provides a major boost to ancillary units and advances the goal of a self reliant India.
How each side framed it
- Centre-left
- Framed the policy as a shift toward a military industrial complex while questioning security risks and private sector capacity.
- Centre-right
- Framed the policy as a strategic success that dramatically increases production and strengthens national self reliance.
Sources
100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.