the news now
This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Israel and United States Clash Over Israeli Strikes on Syrian Airbase

8 sources across 6 countries

Who reported this

  • Le Monde France · Centre-left · Fonds pour l'independance de la presse
  • France 24 France · Centre · Public · France Medias Monde (French state holding)
  • Haaretz Israel · Left · Schocken family and M. DuMont Schauberg
  • The Jerusalem Post Israel · Centre-right · Mirkaei Tikshoret (Eli Azur)
  • La Tercera Chile · Centre-right · Copesa (Saieh family)
  • South China Morning Post Hong Kong · Centre-right · Alibaba Group
  • Dawn Pakistan · Centre-left · Pakistan Herald Publications (Haroon family)
  • Bloomberg United States · Centre · Bloomberg L.P. (Michael Bloomberg)

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Israel and the United States have exchanged conflicting accounts regarding an Israeli airstrike on the Abu al-Duhur military airbase in northwestern Syria. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz stated that the operation was authorized by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after intelligence indicated Turkey intended to deploy military assets at the base, which Israel viewed as a threat to its security. Katz claimed that Israel informed the United States of its intentions and warned Syrian officials before the strike. He asserted that the operation caught Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in a compromising position and forced him to back down.

U.S. Special Envoy to Syria and Ambassador to Turkey Tom Barrack disputed this account. Barrack stated that the U.S. analyzed the intelligence provided by Israel and concluded that the claims of Turkish troop movements were not true. He further claimed that neither the U.S. nor Turkey were informed of the attack in advance. Barrack suggested that the strike may have been an attempt to bait Turkey or a political move intended to appeal to voters ahead of Israeli elections. He warned that the lack of coordination risked a direct military confrontation between Israel and Turkey, comparing the danger to a 2015 incident involving a Russian jet.

Both Turkey and Syria have denied any plans to deploy Turkish troops to the Abu al-Duhur base. Damascus condemned the raid as an unjustified act of aggression. Separately, the Israeli military reported a drone strike in southern Syria on Saturday targeting a person they described as a terrorist preparing an imminent attack on Israeli soldiers. Syrian media reported that one person was wounded in that strike.

Outlets with a center right lean emphasized the security justifications provided by the Israeli government and the claim that Turkey was forced to retreat. Outlets with a center left or left lean focused more heavily on the U.S. warnings of unnecessary escalation and the potential political motivations behind the strike.

How each side framed it

Left
These sources prioritized the U.S. envoy's claims that Israel risked a dangerous confrontation for political gain.
Centre-left
These sources highlighted the U.S. condemnation of the strike as an unnecessary escalation and the Syrian perspective.
Centre
These sources focused on the diplomatic friction and the exchange of insults between regional leaders.
Centre-right
These sources emphasized Israel's security concerns and the effectiveness of the strike in deterring Turkey.

Sources

93% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.