the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Israel Retaliates After UK and Allies Impose Sanctions on West Bank Settlements

15 sources across 11 countries · 1 of them is linked to a state

Who reported this

  • Haaretz Israel · Left · Schocken family and M. DuMont Schauberg
  • The Times of Israel Israel · Centre · Seth Klarman (majority backer)
  • The Jerusalem Post Israel · Centre-right · Mirkaei Tikshoret (Eli Azur)
  • The Guardian United Kingdom · Centre-left · Scott Trust Limited
  • BBC News United Kingdom · Centre · Public · Licence fee, royal charter
  • Reuters United Kingdom · Centre · Thomson Reuters Corporation
  • France 24 France · Centre · Public · France Medias Monde (French state holding)
  • Frankfurter Allgemeine Germany · Centre-right · FAZIT-Stiftung (foundation)
  • The Jakarta Post Indonesia · Centre-left · PT Bina Media Tenggara
  • Corriere della Sera Italy · Centre-right · RCS MediaGroup (Cairo Communication)
  • Premium Times Nigeria · Centre · Premium Times Services Ltd
  • Dawn Pakistan · Centre-left · Pakistan Herald Publications (Haroon family)
  • Al Jazeera Qatar · Centre-left · State-affiliated · Qatari government funded
  • Daily Maverick South Africa · Centre-left · Reader-funded
  • Al-Monitor United States · Centre · Jamal Daniel

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

The United Kingdom, France, and Canada have announced trade sanctions on goods produced in Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank. This coordinated effort was supported by a joint statement from twelve nations, including several European countries, which stated that Israeli settlement expansion undermines the possibility of a two-state solution. British Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband described the situation in the West Bank as ethnic cleansing and announced a ban on imports from illegal settlements, as well as sanctions against individuals and companies that facilitate settlement activity. Prime Minister Andy Burnham defended the move as a necessary stand against injustice.

How each side framed it

Left
These outlets framed the sanctions as largely symbolic or as a domestic political stunt with limited material impact on Israel.
Centre-left
These reports emphasized the illegality of the settlements and the necessity of the sanctions to protect Palestinian rights.
Centre
These outlets focused on the diplomatic friction and the internal debate within the UK Jewish community regarding security.
Centre-right
These sources highlighted the retaliatory nature of the sanctions and the potential for them to be viewed as discriminatory or politically motivated.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.