the news now
This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Meta Faces Landmark Trial Over Alleged Youth Addiction and Data Privacy

10 sources across 8 countries

Who reported this

  • France 24 France · Centre · Public · France Medias Monde (French state holding)
  • Next.ink France · Centre · INpact Mediagroup, subscriber funded
  • ANSA Italy · Centre · Publisher cooperative
  • Corriere della Sera Italy · Centre-right · RCS MediaGroup (Cairo Communication)
  • CNN Brasil Brazil · Centre · Rubens Menin (MRV)
  • La Tercera Chile · Centre-right · Copesa (Saieh family)
  • NRC Netherlands · Centre · Mediahuis
  • El Pais Spain · Centre-left · Grupo PRISA
  • Neue Zuercher Zeitung Switzerland · Centre-right · Dispersed shareholders, no controlling stake
  • Reuters United Kingdom · Centre · Thomson Reuters Corporation

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

A major federal trial began on August 18 in Oakland, California, where Meta is accused of designing Facebook and Instagram to be addictive for children and adolescents. The lawsuit was brought by a coalition of 29 U.S. states, with the current proceedings focusing on complaints from California, Colorado, Kentucky, and New Jersey. Prosecutors allege that Meta utilized features such as infinite scrolling, recommendation algorithms, push notifications, and the like button to encourage compulsive use. They further claim the company collected personal data from children under 13 without parental consent, violating the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act.

During the opening proceedings, Arturo Bejar, a former Meta engineer and whistleblower, testified that the company prioritized rapid product launches over user safety. He stated that Meta executives were warned about the harms caused by the design of Instagram. In response, Meta's legal team has denied the allegations, calling them unfounded. The company highlighted its efforts to protect minors, including the deletion of 600,000 accounts belonging to children under 13 in the last three months.

Financial stakes in the case are significant. While Meta's own court documents suggested potential penalties could reach 1.4 trillion dollars, prosecutors have indicated a figure closer to 200 billion dollars. Beyond monetary damages, the states seek to force Meta to modify its platforms by reinforcing age verification and removing addictive AI algorithms. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers will preside over the case, assisted by an eight person advisory jury. The trial is expected to last between four and seven weeks and may include testimony from CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Instagram head Adam Mosseri.

This case is part of a broader wave of litigation against tech giants including TikTok, Google, and Snap. Meta has already faced previous losses, including a 942 million dollar judgment in New Mexico and a 6 million dollar settlement in Los Angeles.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
These outlets highlighted the testimony of whistleblowers and the contrast between Meta's internal knowledge and its public statements.
Centre
These outlets focused on the legal mechanics, the specific roles of the judge and jury, and the broader industry context.
Centre-right
These outlets emphasized the potential financial risk to the company's continuity and the specific technical features under fire.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.