the news now
This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Security Experts Question Effectiveness of OpenAI's ChatGPT for Teens

2 sources across 2 countries · India · Italy

Who reported this

  • The Indian Express India · Centre · Indian Express Group (Goenka family)
  • ANSA Italy · Centre · Publisher cooperative

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Every outlet covering this story shares the same political lean; read with that in mind.

OpenAI has launched ChatGPT for Teens, a version of its chatbot designed for users between the ages of 13 and 17 with additional age appropriate safeguards. The offering is not a separate application but integrates protections into the regular ChatGPT experience when a user is identified as being under 18. OpenAI uses a combination of stated or verified age and an age prediction system that analyzes account signals, such as usage patterns and conversation topics, to determine a user's age. When the system is uncertain, it defaults to the under 18 experience.

Security experts and child protection organizations have expressed doubts regarding the efficacy of these tools. Critics argue that the age estimation technology may not be precise enough and could be easily bypassed. In India, specific concerns have been raised regarding shared device usage. A study by the RATI Foundation found that 62 percent of Indian teenagers use shared devices, which complicates the ability of a system to identify the specific person behind an account.

Further concerns involve the reliability of the safeguards during actual use. Testing by Business Insider indicated that the chatbot could be persuaded to write essays after repeated prompting, despite initial refusals. Additionally, experts have questioned the transparency and speed of safety alerts. While OpenAI claims human review of high risk chats and parental notification within one hour, some independent tests have previously shown delays of up to 48 hours for alerts related to self harm. Some associations have called for maximum protections to be enabled automatically for all minors rather than requiring parents to manually link their profiles.

How each side framed it

Centre
Both center leaning outlets focused on the technical limitations and the skepticism of security experts regarding the actual effectiveness of the safeguards.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.