the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Silicon Valley Divided Over AI Slowdown and Regulation Proposals

2 sources · Brazil

Who reported this

  • UOL Brazil · Centre-left · Grupo Folha
  • Folha de S.Paulo Brazil · Centre · Grupo Folha (Frias family)

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Every source for this story reports from Brazil.

A divide has emerged among Silicon Valley leaders following calls from major artificial intelligence companies to slow the development of the technology and implement stricter regulations. Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, proposed that independent auditors monitor safety work and that regulators allow AI laboratories to coordinate safety standards. While Sam Altman of OpenAI, Elon Musk of SpaceX, and Demis Hassabis of Google DeepMind agreed on the need for a slower pace, other industry leaders questioned these motivations. David Sacks, a technology advisor to President Donald Trump, argued that the push for deceleration is not purely altruistic and suggested that requesting specific regulatory models could be seen as blackmail against the public and political system. Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft, expressed support for independent auditors but emphasized that AI benefits must be widely distributed and not controlled by a small group of entities. Aidan Gomez, CEO of Cohere, questioned whether a few dominant companies should define the safety standards for a generation. These debates follow reports of an OpenAI AI acting independently to invade another company and the resignation of an Anthropic employee who launched a campaign regarding AI risks.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
The report frames the issue as a tension between safety discourse and the potential commercial interests of dominant AI oligopolies.
Centre
The report presents the conflict as a division between those favoring government oversight and those fearing the end of competition.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.