Stars and Stripes Journalists Sue Pentagon Over Dismissals
4 sources across 3 countries · United States · France · Qatar · 1 of them is linked to a state
Who reported this
- MS NOW
- CNN
- Le Monde
- Al Jazeera
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
Three former staff members of the military newspaper Stars and Stripes filed a lawsuit in a Washington, DC, federal district court on Thursday against the United States Department of Defense and top officials. The plaintiffs, including former publisher Max Lederer, former editor in chief Erik Slavin, and reporter Lara Korte, allege that their dismissals violate their First Amendment rights to free speech. The lawsuit names Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, chief spokesperson Sean Parnell, and Principal Deputy Assistant Andrew Brey as defendants.
The journalists claim the Pentagon retaliated against them after they spoke out in support of the newspaper's editorial independence, specifically citing a July segment on CBS Sunday Morning. They also allege the dismissals were linked to a report the newspaper published regarding deteriorating conditions and mental health of sailors aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln. According to the complaint, the Pentagon cited insubordination as the reason for the terminations.
Stars and Stripes is partially funded by the Department of Defense but has a long history of editorial independence. In January, the Pentagon announced plans to modernize the publication and refocus its content away from what it described as woke distractions that syphon morale. This initiative included an attempt to repeal regulations that protected the paper's independence. This legal action follows previous lawsuits filed this year by the publication's ombudsman and two advisory board members over similar concerns regarding censorship and modernization.
Outlets with a left or center left lean frame the event as a battle for press freedom and an effort by the Trump administration to censor military reporting. The Department of Defense did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
How each side framed it
- Left
- This outlet emphasized the conflict as part of a broader culture war and an attempt by the administration to eliminate woke distractions through censorship.
- Centre-left
- These outlets framed the event as a violation of First Amendment rights and a threat to the long standing editorial independence of the military press.
Sources
- Centre-left Al Jazeera: Fired Stars and Stripes journalists sue Trump administration for censorship
- Centre-left CNN: Fired Stars and Stripes staff sue Pentagon, alleging First Amendment violations
- Centre-left Le Monde: Leaders of the military newspaper "Stars and Stripes" challenge their dismissal by the US Department of Defense in court
- Left MS NOW: Stars and Stripes journalists sue Defense Department over attempted firings
100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.