Supreme Court of India Seeks Government Response on Social Media Use by Minors
2 sources · India
Who reported this
- The Indian Express
- Hindustan Times
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
Every source for this story reports from India.
The Supreme Court of India has sought a response from the Centre regarding a petition that seeks restrictions on social media use by minors. A bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant stated that there is a need for safeguards and a firewall to protect children in India. The petition was filed by the non profit child rights body Just Rights for Children Alliance. The petition argues that because the Indian Contract Act declares a minor's consent for an agreement to be void, children under 18 should not be permitted to independently create accounts on social media platforms, as doing so requires accepting terms of service and privacy policies. The petition highlights risks such as cyberbullying, trafficking, and sexual exploitation. It suggests that access should only be permitted for lawful and educational content through accounts controlled by parents or guardians. The plea also notes that the Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 recognizes the vulnerability of children and requires parental consent for processing their personal data. The petition urges the Centre to declare accounts opened by children to be void and requests the court to restrict digital platforms from entering contracts with minors. The court noted that other jurisdictions have taken similar steps, including Australia, Malaysia, and Indonesia, which have implemented bans on social media use for minors under 16.
How each side framed it
- Centre
- The center lean outlet framed the event as a legal question regarding whether minors can be on social media.
- Centre-right
- The center right outlet framed the event as a necessary move toward establishing safeguards and firewalls to protect children from digital harms.
Sources
100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.