the news now
This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Trump Administration's Board of Peace Conditions Israeli Withdrawal on Hamas Disarmament

4 sources across 4 countries · Hong Kong · Israel · Japan · Qatar · 1 of them is linked to a state

Who reported this

  • South China Morning Post Hong Kong · Centre-right · Alibaba Group
  • The Jerusalem Post Israel · Centre-right · Mirkaei Tikshoret (Eli Azur)
  • Asahi Shimbun Japan · Centre-left · Asahi Shimbun Company (family and employee held)
  • Al Jazeera Qatar · Centre-left · State-affiliated · Qatari government funded

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

The US backed Board of Peace has stated that the Israeli military withdrawal from Gaza will only begin after the complete disarmament of Hamas. This condition follows objections from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and members of his security cabinet who had urged a vote to reject the framework. The board clarified that withdrawal beyond the Yellow Line, which marks the area currently under Hamas control, will occur once the decommissioning of weapons is complete as Hamas committed to mediators. Nickolay Mladenov, the high representative for Gaza under the Board of Peace, met with Netanyahu to reach a common understanding of these shared objectives.

Hamas spokesperson Ghazi Hamad told Piers Morgan that the group accepted the agreement due to forced necessity and the hard circumstances in Gaza. Hamad stated the deal was necessary to save citizens from displacement and mass killing. However, he also claimed that Hamas has not changed its mentality and views resisting the occupation as a holy mission. While Hamad did not explicitly answer when the group would disarm, he suggested that Hamas might use different tactics and tools in the future. He further expressed doubt that Israel would fulfill its commitments, citing a state of arrogance and supremacy.

Reporting on the event varied by political lean. Center right sources focused on the security conditions of the withdrawal and highlighted Hamas's continued commitment to resistance and its history of violence. Center left sources emphasized the humanitarian necessity of the deal from the perspective of saving Gaza and the diplomatic efforts to secure the disarmament framework.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
These sources focused on the humanitarian necessity of the deal and the diplomatic framework for peace.
Centre-right
These sources emphasized the security requirements for Israel and highlighted the contradictory nature of Hamas's statements regarding disarmament.

Sources

89% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.