US Federal Judges Clear Way for Trump Administration to End TPS for South Sudan and Myanmar
5 sources across 4 countries · United Kingdom · Germany · Qatar · Singapore · 2 of them are linked to a state
Who reported this
- The Guardian
- Reuters
- Der Spiegel
- Al Jazeera
- The Straits Times
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
Two federal judges in Boston and Chicago have ruled that the Trump administration may end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for nationals of South Sudan and Myanmar. The decisions, issued on August 7, reject last ditch efforts by immigrant rights advocates to maintain the protections that allow eligible migrants to live and work legally in the United States. The rulings follow a June Supreme Court decision that allowed the administration to end similar protections for thousands of people from Haiti and Syria.
According to reports, the termination of TPS would affect approximately 232 South Sudanese and about 4,000 people from Myanmar. In Boston, Judge Patti Saris rejected the argument that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) lacked the authority to terminate the status, stating that such a claim would also invalidate the department's authority to grant the protections initially. In Chicago, Judge Matthew Kennelly reached a similar conclusion regarding the Myanmar case. James Percival, general counsel for the DHS, stated on X that only the TPS terminations for Ethiopia and Somalia remain blocked by the courts.
Center left outlets frame the rulings as part of a radical migration policy that ignores the ongoing instability and violence in the home countries of the affected migrants. These reports highlight that South Sudan has been ravaged by civil war since 2011 and that Myanmar has been in turmoil since a 2021 military coup. Conversely, center right framing emphasizes the legal authority of the executive branch and the fulfillment of the administration's campaign promises to the American people.
How each side framed it
- Centre-left
- Framed the event as a humanitarian concern and a result of a rightward shift in the judiciary.
- Centre
- Presented the event as a legal development regarding the removal of migrant protections.
- Centre-right
- Framed the event as a matter of executive authority and the delivery of promised policy outcomes.
Sources
- Centre-left Al Jazeera: US courts clear way for deportations of South Sudan, Myanmar nationals
- Centre-left Der Spiegel: USA: Court confirms end of deportation protection for South Sudanese
- Centre Reuters: US judges allow Trump to end protections for migrants from South Sudan, Myanmar - Reuters
- Centre-left The Guardian: Judge approves Trump effort to end South Sudan TPS protections
- Centre-right The Straits Times: US judges allow Trump to end protections for migrants from South Sudan, Myanmar
100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.