US Judge Blocks Trump Administration Visa Restrictions for Students and Journalists
7 sources across 6 countries · 1 of them is linked to a state
Who reported this
- Yonhap
- The Korea Herald
- The Daily Star
- Folha de S.Paulo
- Asahi Shimbun
- Rappler
- Reuters
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
A US federal judge in Boston blocked the Trump administration from implementing a new rule that would have limited the duration of stay for foreign students, journalists, and exchange visitors. US District Judge F. Dennis Saylor issued the preliminary injunction on Monday, September 14, one day before the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) rules were scheduled to take effect. The ruling follows a lawsuit filed by a coalition of unions and higher education advocacy groups.
Under the proposed rules, international students on F visas and exchange visitors on J visas would have been limited to a maximum stay of four years. Foreign journalists on I visas would have seen their initial stay limited to 240 days. These rules would have replaced a long standing system where visas were granted for the duration of status. Judge Saylor, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, described the DHS justifications for the rule as exceptionally weak and bordering on the absurd. He noted that the new system would make visa extensions entirely discretionary and unappealable, which he suggested could lead to the targeting of journalists critical of the government.
In response to the ruling, DHS General Counsel James Percival argued that the court was permitting rampant abuse of the immigration system, citing instances where individuals might stay for decades while taking only one class per semester. Conversely, the judge warned that the rule could cause catastrophic damage to the US economy and higher education system, potentially costing major research universities hundreds of millions of dollars and reducing enrollments.
The impact of the rule would have been global. Reports indicate that over 13,000 South Koreans were subject to the proposed changes, including thousands of students and exchange visitors. The judge scheduled a further hearing for October 2 to consider the merits of the case.
How each side framed it
- Centre-left
- These outlets emphasized the potential catastrophic harm to the economy and higher education institutions.
- Centre
- These outlets focused on the legal specifics of the injunction and the judge's skepticism regarding the government's reasoning.
- Centre-right
- These outlets highlighted the specific impact on South Korean nationals and the administration's goal of preventing visa abuse.
Sources
- Centre-left Asahi Shimbun: US District Court blocks shortening of visa periods for study and reporting; says irreparable harm will occur
- Centre Folha de S.Paulo: US judge blocks Trump rule restricting stay of students and journalists
- Centre-left Rappler: US judge blocks Trump limits on how long foreign students, journalists can stay
- Centre Reuters: US judge blocks Trump limits on how long foreign students, journalists can stay - reuters.com
- Centre The Daily Star: US judge postpones new visa rules for foreign students, journalists
- Centre-right The Korea Herald: US judge blocks Trump's move to limit duration of stay for foreign students, journalists: report
- Centre Yonhap: U.S. judge blocks Trump's move to limit duration of stay for foreign students, journalists: report
100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.