the news now
This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

US Senate Passes Sweeping Russia and Iran Sanctions Bill

7 sources across 6 countries

Who reported this

  • The Indian Express India · Centre · Indian Express Group (Goenka family)
  • Hindustan Times India · Centre-right · HT Media (KK Birla group)
  • Politico Europe Belgium · Centre · Axel Springer SE
  • Deutsche Welle Germany · Centre · Public · German federal public-law corporation
  • Telex Hungary · Centre · Reader-funded, staff-owned
  • Tempo English Indonesia · Centre-left · PT Tempo Inti Media
  • The Times of Israel Israel · Centre · Seth Klarman (majority backer)

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

The US Senate voted 86 to 11 on Friday to pass the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026. The legislation, championed by the late Senator Lindsey Graham, aims to increase economic pressure on Moscow to end the war in Ukraine by sanctioning Russian leadership, the energy sector, and entities supporting Russia's defense industry. The bill also includes expanded sanctions on Iran. President Donald Trump has signaled that he would sign the bill if it passes the House of Representatives, which is scheduled to consider the measure when lawmakers return from recess in September.

A central and contentious provision of the bill grants the president authority to impose tariffs of up to 100 percent on countries that purchase Russian oil and gas. While supporters argue these tariffs are necessary to curb the flow of cash to Russia's war chest, critics express concern over the broad power granted to the executive branch. The bill allows the president to waive sanctions if they are deemed in the national interest of the United States. An amendment to remove the tariff language was rejected in a 64 to 32 vote.

International reactions focus heavily on the potential economic impact. Reports indicate that India and China are primary targets due to their status as top importers of Russian energy. Other mentioned targets include Slovakia, Hungary, and Azerbaijan. In India, the bill is viewed as a significant threat to its energy security, especially as the country increased its reliance on Russian crude following disruptions in the Middle East. Some reports note that the bill may include exceptions for countries whose Russian gas purchases are below 15 percent of Russia's total gas imports.

Within the US, the bill's trajectory reflects internal political tensions. While the Senate vote was overwhelmingly bipartisan, some lawmakers warn that the House may struggle with the tariff provisions. Concerns have been raised that such powers could be weaponized against allies or lead to higher costs for American consumers.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
This outlet framed the story primarily as a threat to India, emphasizing the potential for 100 percent tariffs on Indian goods.
Centre
These outlets focused on the legislative process, the bipartisan nature of the Senate vote, and the internal political debate over executive tariff powers.
Centre-right
This outlet highlighted the specific economic risks to India and detailed the historical context of US-India trade tensions and energy dependencies.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.