X Corp Forces Shutdown of Nitter and XCancel via Cease and Desist Notices
3 sources across 3 countries · Argentina · France · United Kingdom
Who reported this
- Infobae
- Next.ink
- The Register
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
X Corp has issued cease and desist letters to the open source project Nitter and the related service XCancel, forcing both to suspend their operations. The notices were sent on August 24, 2025, and demanded the definitive removal of Nitter instances and its project repository. Nitter's maintainer, zedeus, confirmed that nitter.net is offline and development has stopped while he seeks legal advice. The GitHub repository for the project has been archived and set to read only. Nitter and XCancel provided a way for users to view X posts without creating an account, offering a read only experience without ads, JavaScript, or IP tracking. X Corp alleges that Nitter engaged in the illicit use and circumvention of its API, as well as unauthorized data scraping and access to user login tokens. According to reports, X Corp claims these actions violate various state and federal laws in the United States. This follows a previous disruption in January 2024 when API changes by X hindered Nitter's functionality, though the project had since resumed activity. Outlets with a center lean describe Nitter as a privacy focused alternative for users wishing to avoid Elon Musk's platform and its data marketing. In contrast, a center right outlet emphasizes X Corp's allegations of illegal API usage and the violation of platform rules. One center outlet notes a contradiction between these legal actions and Elon Musk's public stance on free speech, as well as X's own use of public data to train its Grok AI.
How each side framed it
- Centre
- Framed the event as a loss of a privacy tool and highlighted the irony of Musk's free speech claims.
- Centre-right
- Focused on the legality of the API usage and the specific rule violations alleged by X Corp.
Sources
- Centre-right Infobae: Nitter goes out of service after receiving a cease and desist letter from X demanding its definitive removal
- Centre Next.ink: ☕️ X forces Nitter and XCancel to suspend their alternative service
- Centre The Register: Nitter no more? X sends in the lawyers to shut down open source project
93% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.