the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Amazon Allegedly Destroying Physical Books to Train AI Models

2 sources across 2 countries · Brazil · United States

Who reported this

  • Tecnoblog Brazil · Centre · Founder-owned (Thiago Mobilon)
  • 404 Media United States · Centre-left · Journalist-owned (former Motherboard staff)

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Amazon is reportedly operating a logistics facility in Las Vegas dedicated to the mass digitalization and destruction of physical books to train its artificial intelligence models. An investigation by 404 Media tracked a shipment of one thousand books, including a rare copy containing a hidden Apple AirTag, to a facility operated by a team called VGT3 within an Amazon complex. According to reports, employees at the site cut the spines and bindings of the books to increase the speed of industrial scanners, effectively destroying the original materials after the text is converted into digital data. The VGT3 logo, featuring a dinosaur tearing a book, reportedly reflects this process of destruction. Amazon confirmed in a statement that it purchases publications through legitimate commercial channels to help develop and improve its products and services. The practice of buying physical books is seen as a way to obtain high quality, human written text from before the 2022 AI boom, which avoids the risk of training models on machine generated content. This approach also provides a legally safer alternative to scraping digital libraries, a practice that has previously led to massive copyright lawsuits and fines for other AI companies.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
The center-left lean outlet framed the story as a destructive act, specifically highlighting the loss of rare books.
Centre
The center lean outlet focused on the technical and legal motivations behind the practice, emphasizing the need for clean data and the avoidance of copyright fines.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.