Carlsen Verlag Sues OpenAI Over AI Generated Children's Book Content
2 sources · Germany
Who reported this
- Der Spiegel
- Frankfurter Allgemeine
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
Every source for this story reports from Germany.
The Carlsen Verlag publishing house has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI Ireland Ltd. over the unauthorized use of the children's book series Das NEINhorn. The publisher, author Marc-Uwe Kling, and illustrator Astrid Henn allege that their copyright has been violated because ChatGPT can generate stories and illustrations that are nearly indistinguishable from the original works. According to Carlsen, simple prompts lead the AI to produce texts and images that mirror the essential creative elements of the series. The publisher further claims that ChatGPT provides complete print templates including covers, imprints, and fake order numbers or ISBNs. Carlsen argues that the high level of detail indicates the original works were used illegally to train OpenAI's language and image models through memorization. Illustrator Astrid Henn described the use of her work as theft, while Marc-Uwe Kling compared the action to illegal downloading of films or books. A center-right source noted that in a test, the AI produced a seven page mockup in under two minutes, though the AI claimed it could not create an exact continuation in the original style. The lawsuit seeks to stop the unlicensed use of the works, force the disclosure of irregularities, and secure compensation for damages.
How each side framed it
- Centre-left
- The reporting focused on the legal rights of the creators and the ethical argument against AI companies stealing global art and culture.
- Centre-right
- The reporting highlighted the technical ease with which the AI copies the work while characterizing the AI's own claims of creating a homage as a flimsy excuse.
Sources
100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.