the news now
This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Bar Council of India Chairman Apologizes After Enrollment Row Involving NALSAR and NLSIU

4 sources · India

Who reported this

  • Scroll.in India · Left · Scroll Media Inc, reader-funded
  • The Hindu India · Centre-left · Kasturi & Sons (family-owned)
  • The Indian Express India · Centre · Indian Express Group (Goenka family)
  • Hindustan Times India · Centre-right · HT Media (KK Birla group)

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Every source for this story reports from India.

Bar Council of India (BCI) Chairperson Manan Kumar Mishra has issued a written apology to law students following a controversy involving the National Academy of Legal Studies and Research (NALSAR) University of Law in Hyderabad. The dispute began on August 13 when the BCI directed state bar councils to halt the enrollment of NALSAR's 2026 graduating batch as advocates. This directive was issued after students campaigned against the invitation of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant to their convocation. The BCI withdrew the order within hours and later closed all proceedings against the students.

Chief Justice Surya Kant criticized the BCI's move as absolutely uncalled for, stating that the matter was a dialogue between the students and himself. The students' objections to the CJI's presence were based on his reported remarks during a court hearing regarding police excesses during protests in Delhi, where he allegedly told a lawyer not to waste the court's time.

In a subsequent open letter, students and alumni of the National Law School of India University (NLSIU) in Bengaluru expressed solidarity with NALSAR. The letter, signed by 165 graduating students, 409 current students, and 128 alumni, opposed the attendance of both CJI Surya Kant and BCI Chairman Manan Kumar Mishra at NLSIU's own upcoming convocation. The NLSIU group described the BCI's initial actions as an attack on the fundamental right to free speech and characterized the demand for a report identifying protesting students as a witch hunt.

In his apology, Chairman Mishra stated that peaceful disagreement and protest are important features of a constitutional democracy. He expressed regret if his words or letters had hurt the feelings of law students and urged them to make their decisions independently. The BCI is a statutory body established under the Advocates Act of 1961 to regulate the Indian Bar and legal education.

How each side framed it

Left
This coverage focused on the apology from the BCI Chairman and the specific criticisms leveled by the CJI against the BCI's overreach.
Centre-left
This framing emphasized the systemic barriers of class, caste, and gender and the BCI's alleged pattern of partisan political behavior.
Centre
These reports focused on the legal functions of the BCI and the factual sequence of the protest and subsequent solidarity.
Centre-right
These reports highlighted the specific demands of the NLSIU students and framed the BCI's actions as a potential witch hunt against free speech.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.