the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Brazilian Senate Commission to Vote on Ending 6x1 Work Schedule

2 sources · Brazil

Who reported this

  • G1 Brazil · Centre-left · Grupo Globo (Marinho family)
  • Folha de S.Paulo Brazil · Centre · Grupo Folha (Frias family)

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Every source for this story reports from Brazil.

The Constitution and Justice Commission (CCJ) of the Brazilian Senate is expected to vote this Wednesday, January 2, on a proposed amendment to end the 6x1 work schedule. The proposal, which has already passed the Chamber of Deputies, seeks to reduce the maximum weekly working hours from 44 to 40 over a period of 14 months while ensuring two days of weekly rest without salary reductions. Senator Omar Aziz, the rapporteur for the proposal, stated that he will maintain the text approved by the Chamber and believes there are enough votes for approval in the commission despite expected obstruction efforts from the opposition.

Under the proposed timeline, the weekly workload would drop to 42 hours within two months and reach 40 hours within one year. The end of the 6x1 scale, which guarantees at least two days off per week, preferably including Sunday, would take effect 60 days after the text is promulgated. Senator Aziz argued that the reduction is a matter of distributive justice, noting that the 6x1 schedule disproportionately affects workers with lower incomes and less education.

Opposition members, including Senator Rogério Marinho, intend to use procedural tactics to delay the vote or propose alternative texts, such as a system based on payment per hour worked. Business representatives and industry confederations have expressed concerns regarding productivity and competitiveness, suggesting that changes should be negotiated collectively between employers and employees rather than mandated by the Constitution. Some critics specifically highlighted the potential negative impact on micro-businesses and schools.

Center-left sources frame the move as a necessary labor reform and a result of a renewed relationship between President Lula and Senate President Davi Alcolumbre. In contrast, center sources highlight the political calculations involved, noting that government allies view the proposal as a potential tool to boost President Lula's popularity ahead of the presidential election. Center sources also mention that the legislative process is continuing despite a separate crisis involving Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
Framed the event as a matter of labor rights and distributive justice, focusing on the benefits of reduced working hours for the workforce.
Centre
Framed the event as a strategic political maneuver by the government to gain electoral advantage while noting the legislative hurdles.

Sources

93% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.