the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Brazilian Supreme Court Holds Historic Session to Decide on Investigation of Justice Alexandre de Moraes

5 sources · Brazil

Who reported this

  • G1 Brazil · Centre-left · Grupo Globo (Marinho family)
  • CNN Brasil Brazil · Centre · Rubens Menin (MRV)
  • Folha de S.Paulo Brazil · Centre · Grupo Folha (Frias family)
  • Estadao Brazil · Centre-right · Grupo Estado (Mesquita family)
  • Gazeta do Povo Brazil · Centre-right · Grupo Paranaense de Comunicacao

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Every source for this story reports from Brazil.

The Brazilian Supreme Court (STF) is holding an unprecedented plenary session on Tuesday to determine whether Justice Alexandre de Moraes should be formally investigated over his relationship with former banker Daniel Vorcaro, the owner of Banco Master. The session follows a Federal Police report identifying 52 messages between Vorcaro and Moraes, as well as allegations that Moraes edited a contract worth approximately 130 million reais involving the banker and the law firm of Moraes's wife, Viviane Barci de Moraes. The proceedings are being led by STF President Edson Fachin, who assumed the role of rapporteur to moderate a deepening conflict between justices.

The court is divided into opposing factions. Justices Gilmar Mendes, Cristiano Zanin, and Flávio Dino are aligned with Moraes, while Justice André Mendonça, who originally requested the police report, is supported by Justices Luiz Fux and Kassio Nunes Marques. Justice Cármen Lúcia is viewed as a potential swing vote. The session will first address the validity of the police report, which the Prosecutor General's Office (PGR) has asked to be annulled on the grounds that it was produced without a prior request from the PGR or the Federal Police and without plenary authorization.

Moraes has denied any wrongdoing, stating in a formal manifestation that he never favored Banco Master or Vorcaro and that the accusations are politically motivated. He argues that the investigation is unconstitutional because it was initiated by Justice Mendonça acting on his own authority. Conversely, allies of Mendonça argue that the investigation is necessary to uncover a network of influence. Some justices may also challenge the eligibility of others to vote, citing family ties to the Banco Master case.

Security in Brasília has been significantly reinforced for the event. Access to the plenary is restricted to authorized personnel, and the press is barred from entering the chamber. The military police are utilizing drones and cameras to monitor the area, and public demonstrations in the vicinity of the Three Powers Plaza are prohibited. The outcome remains uncertain, with a high possibility of a request for more time to analyze the evidence, which would delay a final decision.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
Highlights the specific allegations against Moraes while detailing his defense and the procedural irregularities raised by the PGR.
Centre
Focuses on the internal institutional crisis and the procedural tension between the opposing wings of the court.
Centre-right
Emphasizes the historic nature of the potential investigation and suggests that maneuvers by Moraes's allies are attempts to evade justice.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.