the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

BRICS Leaders Gather in Delhi Amid Regional Conflict and Global Power Shifts

2 sources across 2 countries · India · Qatar · 1 of them is linked to a state

Who reported this

  • The Indian Express India · Centre · Indian Express Group (Goenka family)
  • Al Jazeera Qatar · Centre-left · State-affiliated · Qatari government funded

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Leaders from BRICS nations, including China's Xi Jinping, Russia's Vladimir Putin, and Iran's Masoud Pezeshkian, are meeting in Delhi for a summit that coincides with heightened tensions in the Middle East and shifting diplomatic ties with the United States. The summit occurs as Iran and the United States engage in a military confrontation involving strikes on Iranian positions and Iranian attacks on shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, which has pushed Brent crude prices to around 97 dollars a barrel. While the forum seeks to expand cooperation in agriculture, health, and digitalization, internal divisions persist. A center leaning report notes a sharp divide between Iran and the United Arab Emirates, as Tehran seeks condemnation of American and Israeli actions while Abu Dhabi emphasizes sovereignty and freedom of navigation.

Perspectives on the summit's efficacy vary by political framing. A center leaning report frames the event as being overshadowed by potential direct diplomacy between President Donald Trump, Xi Jinping, and Vladimir Putin, suggesting that leader driven deals between the US, China, and Russia could weaken the coherence of BRICS. In contrast, a center left leaning report frames the summit as a critical venue for peace, arguing that BRICS members and partners have been the only entities capable of brokering ceasefires in the current conflict. This perspective highlights China's role as a mediator with commercial interests on both sides of the war, noting that Beijing buys the majority of Iranian crude while also maintaining significant imports from Gulf states.

Other key diplomatic focuses include the relationship between India and China. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to meet with Xi Jinping for the first time since 2019 to discuss economic relations and the boundary situation. Meanwhile, the broader geopolitical landscape remains volatile. Russia continues to face a costly war that has not produced a decisive victory, while China seeks to position itself as both a leader of the Global South and a co equal manager of the international order.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
Framed the summit as a uniquely effective mechanism for brokering ceasefires where Western diplomacy has failed.
Centre
Framed the summit as potentially irrelevant or overshadowed by high level bilateral deals between the US, Russia, and China.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.