Government Analysis Shows Banning Zero Hours Contracts Could Cost Businesses Up to £3 Billion Annually
2 sources · United Kingdom
Who reported this
- The Independent
- Sky News
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
Every source for this story reports from United Kingdom.
New government analysis indicates that banning zero hours contracts could cost businesses between 350 million pounds and 2.9 billion pounds each year. The report identifies an indicative central baseline cost of 1.1 billion pounds. Ministers have defended the reforms by stating they will provide greater security for millions of workers facing uncertainty over earnings and hours. The government assessment suggests the measures will support growth by improving worker wellbeing and engagement, which is linked to increased productivity.
Retailers and business groups have criticized the proposal. Helen Dickinson, chief executive of the British Retail Consortium, stated that the costs could be a hammer blow to young people's job prospects. The British Chambers of Commerce and UKHospitality also expressed concern that the added expenses come at a time of soaring youth unemployment and rising national insurance contributions. Additionally, the British Chambers of Commerce noted that these figures contradict previous government claims that the total cost of the Employment Rights Act would be 1 billion pounds.
Outlets with a center lean focused their coverage on the warnings from retailers regarding the negative impact on youth employment. In contrast, coverage from a center left lean provided a more detailed breakdown of the government's economic analysis, balancing the costs to businesses against the projected benefits for worker wellbeing and productivity.
How each side framed it
- Centre-left
- Balanced the potential costs to businesses with the government's arguments regarding worker wellbeing and economic growth.
- Centre
- Focused primarily on the warnings from retailers that the reforms would harm job prospects for young people.
Sources
89% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.