Hackers Leak Millions of Sensitive Berlin Government Files After Ransom Demand Denied
3 sources · Germany
Who reported this
- Der Spiegel
- Sueddeutsche Zeitung
- Frankfurter Allgemeine
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
Every source for this story reports from Germany.
The criminal hacker group Rhysida has published approximately 1.44 million files stolen from the Berlin state administration after the city government refused to pay a ransom of 30 Bitcoin, valued at roughly two million euros. The leaked data, totaling between 5.7 and 5.8 terabytes, was made available on the group's Darknet site on Friday afternoon following the expiration of a countdown timer. The breach occurred between August 7 and August 12, targeting the Senate Departments for Mobility, Transport, Climate Protection and the Environment, as well as the Department for Urban Development, Building and Housing.
The leaked documents include a wide array of sensitive information. Corroborated reports indicate the presence of personnel files, addresses, phone numbers, passwords, and contracts. Some reports specify that the data contains medical certificates, rehabilitation documents, and confidential disciplinary proceedings. Furthermore, the leak reportedly includes security relevant information such as emergency plans and secret communication channels. While the Berlin Senate initially claimed that only publicly accessible data had been stolen, this statement was later proven false.
Experts and officials have responded with varying perspectives. The Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) warned of an increased threat level, noting the risk of phishing attacks and the potential for "hack and leak" operations to influence the upcoming election on September 20. Some IT security experts praised the Senate's decision not to pay the ransom, arguing that paying such groups encourages further attacks. The Berlin administration has stated that the state network is no longer infiltrated and plans to notify affected individuals based on risk assessments.
Outlets with a center left lean emphasized the severity of the security failure, with one describing the leak as a "complete catastrophe" with "state threatening dimensions." In contrast, the center right outlet focused more on the strategic correctness of refusing the ransom and the broader warnings issued by the BSI regarding societal risks.
How each side framed it
- Centre-left
- These outlets focused on the catastrophic nature of the security breach and the sensitivity of the leaked state secrets.
- Centre-right
- This outlet emphasized the legitimacy of the government's refusal to pay the ransom and the BSI's warnings about broader security threats.
Sources
- Centre-left Der Spiegel: Hacker attack in Berlin: Payroll lists, account information, Chancellery plans: this is known about the leak
- Centre-right Frankfurter Allgemeine: Data theft in Berlin: Blackmailers publish sensitive data; BSI warns of increased cyber threat
- Centre-left Sueddeutsche Zeitung: Hacker attack on administration: Apparently secret defense and emergency plans among published Berlin data
- Centre-left Sueddeutsche Zeitung: Cybercrime: What is known so far about the data leak of the Berlin administration
93% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.