Israel Ties Lebanon Withdrawal to Hezbollah Disarmament Amid US Criticism
2 sources across 2 countries · United Kingdom · United States
Who reported this
- Reuters
- Al-Monitor
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
Every outlet covering this story shares the same political lean; read with that in mind.
Israel will not withdraw from southern Lebanon until Hezbollah is disarmed and the threat posed by the group is removed, Defence Minister Israel Katz announced on Thursday. This statement followed remarks made by Katz on Wednesday suggesting that Israeli forces would occupy the territory indefinitely, which drew criticism from the United States. A U.S. State Department official stated that a permanent military presence in south Lebanon is not consistent with the commitments of a U.S. backed deal between Israel and Lebanon's government.
The agreement foresees a progressive Israeli withdrawal linked to the verified disarmament of non state armed groups. While the U.S. official noted that the Lebanese military is implementing the first pilot zones, Hezbollah has rejected disarming and opposes Beirut's talks with Israel. Katz has instructed the IDF to prepare for an extended presence in the area to protect forces and communities until the disarmament goal is achieved.
Separately, a Lebanese official on Thursday denied a report that Beirut had agreed with Israel to a shortlist of countries to verify Hezbollah's disarmament. While a previous report suggested that Britain, Italy, Switzerland, and Indonesia were potential contributors to the verification mechanism, the Lebanese official stated that no such agreement exists and that Beirut is still in discussions with the United States. A State Department official confirmed that meetings in Rome discussed third party verification but did not mention a specific shortlist of countries.
How each side framed it
- Centre
- The reports focused on the diplomatic friction between Israel and the U.S. and the specific logistical disputes regarding the verification of Hezbollah's disarmament.
Sources
- Centre Al-Monitor: Lebanon has not agreed to shortlist of countries that could verify Hezbollah's disarmament, official says
- Centre Al-Monitor: After US criticism, Israel ties Lebanon withdrawal to Hezbollah disarmament
- Centre Reuters: After US criticism, Israel ties Lebanon withdrawal to Hezbollah disarmament - Reuters
100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.