the news now
This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Israeli Forces Fail to Remove Settler Outpost Besieging Palestinian Homes in West Bank

6 sources across 3 countries · Israel · United Kingdom · United States

Who reported this

  • Haaretz Israel · Left · Schocken family and M. DuMont Schauberg
  • The Times of Israel Israel · Centre · Seth Klarman (majority backer)
  • The Jerusalem Post Israel · Centre-right · Mirkaei Tikshoret (Eli Azur)
  • BBC News United Kingdom · Centre · Public · Licence fee, royal charter
  • Reuters United Kingdom · Centre · Thomson Reuters Corporation
  • Al-Monitor United States · Centre · Jamal Daniel

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Israeli security forces withdrew from the village of Qusra in the West Bank on Wednesday after a failed attempt to dismantle an illegal settler outpost that had been besieging Palestinian families since Sunday. The settlers had established temporary structures and blocked roads with stones, trapping members of the Abu Ridi and Hassan families in their homes. The families reported that their water and electricity supplies were cut and that they were subjected to insults and stone throwing. A Palestinian Red Crescent ambulance was permitted to reach the families on Tuesday evening to deliver food and evacuate a child for medical treatment.

On Wednesday morning, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and Border Police deployed to the scene to evacuate the outpost. Clashes broke out between security forces and dozens of settler activists, leading the military to use tear gas and stun grenades. While the IDF dismantled a canopy and other temporary structures, they were unable to remove the settlers from the site. A security source told Army Radio that the operation failed because the plan was leaked to the media, which prompted a large number of settler activists to swarm the area in support of the outpost.

Major General Avi Bluth, head of the IDF Central Command, visited the site and expressed grave concern over the situation. The IDF issued a statement calling the establishment of the outpost illegal, reprehensible, and unacceptable. The military also announced that disciplinary action would be taken against soldiers who were filmed praying with the settlers on Sunday instead of removing them. Despite these measures, homeowners and witnesses stated that the entrance to the homes remained blocked after the military withdrew.

Outlets with a center lean focused on the humanitarian plight of the besieged families and the failure of the military to protect them. Center right sources framed the event as a clash between settler extremists and the IDF, emphasizing the disruption caused by the rioters. Left leaning coverage highlighted the military's failure to clear the outpost and the fact that settlers remained on the property despite the evacuation attempt.

How each side framed it

Left
Emphasized the IDF's inability to remove the settlers and the persistence of the illegal outpost.
Centre
Focused on the humanitarian impact on Palestinian families and the military's failure to resolve the siege.
Centre-right
Framed the event as a conflict between settler extremists and the IDF, emphasizing the role of rioters.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.