the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Lula and Flávio Bolsonaro Tied in Second Round Simulation, Quaest Poll Shows

5 sources across 2 countries · Brazil · United Kingdom

Who reported this

  • G1 Brazil · Centre-left · Grupo Globo (Marinho family)
  • Folha de S.Paulo Brazil · Centre · Grupo Folha (Frias family)
  • Estadao Brazil · Centre-right · Grupo Estado (Mesquita family)
  • Gazeta do Povo Brazil · Centre-right · Grupo Paranaense de Comunicacao
  • Reuters United Kingdom · Centre · Thomson Reuters Corporation

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

A new Quaest poll released on Monday, September 7, shows President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Senator Flávio Bolsonaro tied with 41 percent of intentions of vote in a simulated second round runoff. In the first round scenario, Lula leads with 36 percent, followed by Flávio Bolsonaro at 29 percent and writer Augusto Cury at 8 percent. Other candidates in the first round include Renan Santos and Ronaldo Caiado, both at 3 percent, and Romeu Zema at 2 percent. The poll also notes that 50 percent of Brazilians disapprove of the Lula government, while 43 percent approve.

The survey included scenarios with and without Pablo Marçal, who is currently inelegible but has registered a provisional candidacy. In the scenario including Marçal, he holds 1 percent of the vote. The poll indicates high rejection rates for the two frontrunners, with 55 percent of respondents stating they would not vote for Flávio Bolsonaro and 53 percent saying the same for Lula.

Center leaning outlets frame the rise of Augusto Cury as a symptom of voter fatigue with the polarization between Lula and Bolsonaro. These sources cite political scientists who suggest Cury represents a volatile segment of the electorate that rejects traditional parties. Center right outlets focus on the numerical tie between the two main candidates and the specific disapproval ratings of the current government. Center left outlets emphasize the detailed breakdown of the data across various demographics and the specific margins of error for each candidate.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
Presented the data as a comprehensive breakdown of voting intentions across different social and regional segments.
Centre
Framed the results as a sign of voter exhaustion with political polarization and the rise of a third-party alternative.
Centre-right
Focused on the statistical tie in the runoff and the high disapproval rating of the Lula administration.

Sources

80% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.