the news now
This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Meta and TikTok Face Thousands of Lawsuits Over Youth Social Media Addiction

2 sources across 2 countries · France · South Africa

Who reported this

  • Next.ink France · Centre · INpact Mediagroup, subscriber funded
  • Daily Maverick South Africa · Centre-left · Reader-funded

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Meta and TikTok are facing thousands of lawsuits in the United States alleging that their platforms were designed to be addictive and harmful to young users. A federal appeals court in San Francisco recently rejected arguments from Meta and TikTok that they should be shielded from these proceedings under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The court ruled that while Section 230 may provide a defense against liability during a trial, it does not grant immunity from the lawsuits themselves. Consequently, a trial involving Meta is set to begin on August 12 in Oakland, California. This specific case involves allegations from a coalition of state attorneys general that Meta designed Facebook and Instagram to foster addiction in minors and violated federal laws regarding children's data protection.

The legal pressure on social media companies comes from multiple fronts. Nearly every U.S. state has filed claims against companies like Meta and TikTok, while more than 1,000 school districts have sued for compensation to deal with the fallout of student anxiety, depression, and self harm. Additionally, over 3,300 individual lawsuits have been consolidated in Los Angeles state court. In one individual bellwether case, a jury found Meta and Google negligent, ordering them to pay 4.2 million dollars and 1.8 million dollars respectively, though both companies intend to appeal.

Meta has already faced significant financial penalties in other jurisdictions. A court in New Mexico ordered the company to pay a total of 942 million dollars for failing to protect young users from sexual exploitation and creating a public nuisance. Meta has indicated that the ongoing proceedings by state attorneys general could potentially lead to 1.4 trillion dollars in financial reparations. The companies have denied the allegations, stating that they take action to protect young users and that their products have not contributed to the youth mental health crisis.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
The center-left lean outlet framed the issue as a broader youth mental health crisis and detailed the specific harms such as depression and sexual exploitation.
Centre
The center lean outlet focused on the legal technicalities of the appeals court ruling and the potential financial scale of the reparations.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.