the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

MST Youth Graffiti US Embassy Wall Amid Rising Brazil-US Tensions

3 sources · Brazil

Who reported this

  • CNN Brasil Brazil · Centre · Rubens Menin (MRV)
  • Folha de S.Paulo Brazil · Centre · Grupo Folha (Frias family)
  • Gazeta do Povo Brazil · Centre-right · Grupo Paranaense de Comunicacao

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Every source for this story reports from Brazil.

Members of the Landless Workers' Movement (MST) and the Popular Youth Uprising graffitied the wall of the United States embassy in Brasília on Thursday, August 13. The protesters wrote the phrase "The US make war and profit from death" in both Portuguese and English. During the demonstration, participants burned a US flag and displayed banners criticizing the US war industry and imperialist policies. The MST stated that the action was a protest against the funding of weaponry and sanctions against countries such as Palestine, Cuba, Venezuela, and Iran.

The Civil Police are investigating the incident. According to center-right reporting, the investigation includes a report of a small fire in the embassy area that was quickly extinguished. Some protesters reportedly wore camouflage clothing and Uncle Sam top hats.

The event occurs during a period of significant diplomatic and commercial strain between Brazil and the United States. The Trump administration recently imposed a 37.5 percent tariff on Brazilian exports, citing concerns over unfair trade practices, deforestation, and forced labor. In response, the government of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva filed a formal complaint with the World Trade Organization.

Diplomatic relations have further deteriorated following the US government's decision to revoke the visa of Brazilian Ambassador Maria Luiza Viotti. The White House attributed this move to Brazil's delay in granting agrément to Daniel Perez, the US nominee for ambassador to Brasília. Center reporting notes that this tension follows a period of brief rapprochement in May. Center-right reporting adds that the protest also coincides with broader international tensions involving the US, Israel, and Iran.

How each side framed it

Centre
Framed the event as a symptom of a historic diplomatic crisis and a sequence of aggressive measures by the Trump administration.
Centre-right
Focused on the legality of the act, the police investigation into the fire, and the specific justifications for US tariffs.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.