the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Netanyahu Accused of Ignoring UAE Warning Before October 7 Attack

13 sources across 9 countries

Who reported this

  • Haaretz Israel · Left · Schocken family and M. DuMont Schauberg
  • The Times of Israel Israel · Centre · Seth Klarman (majority backer)
  • The Jerusalem Post Israel · Centre-right · Mirkaei Tikshoret (Eli Azur)
  • Le Monde France · Centre-left · Fonds pour l'independance de la presse
  • France 24 France · Centre · Public · France Medias Monde (French state holding)
  • ANSA Italy · Centre · Publisher cooperative
  • Corriere della Sera Italy · Centre-right · RCS MediaGroup (Cairo Communication)
  • La Nacion Argentina · Centre-right · Saguier family
  • La Tercera Chile · Centre-right · Copesa (Saieh family)
  • El Espectador Colombia · Centre-left · Grupo Santo Domingo
  • NRC Netherlands · Centre · Mediahuis
  • Dawn Pakistan · Centre-left · Pakistan Herald Publications (Haroon family)
  • El Pais Spain · Centre-left · Grupo PRISA

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

An investigation by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reports that United Arab Emirates President Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan warned Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about a planned large scale Hamas operation approximately ten days before the October 7, 2023, attacks. According to the report, the UAE president spoke with Netanyahu for 45 minutes, conveying that Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar was preparing a terrifying operation described as an earthquake. The investigation alleges that Netanyahu responded calmly, believed the threat was focused on the West Bank, and failed to inform the heads of the Shin Bet, Mossad, or the IDF about the warning. The Prime Minister's Office has categorically rejected these claims, calling them absolute lies and denying that such a conversation took place.

Israeli opposition leaders have reacted strongly to the revelations. Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett stated that the report is true and argued that Netanyahu bears personal and direct responsibility for the massacre. Gadi Eisenkot, a former military commander and political rival, called Netanyahu unfit for office and dismissed the Prime Minister's previous claims that he was not woken up early enough on the morning of the attack as pathetic. Yair Lapid also claimed that he and other officials had warned the Prime Minister of the threat weeks prior.

Additional details from the reports suggest that Egyptian intelligence chief Abbas Kamel provided a similar warning around the same period. Some sources indicate that the Shin Bet had recommended a targeted assassination of Yahya Sinwar on October 1, but Netanyahu reportedly did not accept the proposal. While some security officials suggest that this information could have changed the interpretation of intelligence, others in the security establishment maintain that the available data on the night of the attack was too partial to have necessarily changed the outcome.

How each side framed it

Left
This outlet framed the report as an exposé that proved Netanyahu led the country blindly to disaster.
Centre-left
These outlets emphasized the growing fury and calls for Netanyahu's resignation, framing the event as a failure of leadership.
Centre
These outlets focused on the core accusation and the official denial without adding significant political commentary.
Centre-right
These outlets provided detailed accounts of the security warnings and the specific reactions of political rivals while maintaining a focus on the factual dispute.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.