the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Netanyahu Announces Lawsuit Against Haaretz Over Reported UAE Warning

5 sources across 3 countries · Israel · France · Germany

Who reported this

  • Haaretz Israel · Left · Schocken family and M. DuMont Schauberg
  • The Times of Israel Israel · Centre · Seth Klarman (majority backer)
  • The Jerusalem Post Israel · Centre-right · Mirkaei Tikshoret (Eli Azur)
  • France 24 France · Centre · Public · France Medias Monde (French state holding)
  • Der Spiegel Germany · Centre-left · ~50% staff-owned

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has instructed his lawyers to file a libel lawsuit against the newspaper Haaretz and journalist Shlomi Eldar. The legal action follows a report claiming that UAE President Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan warned Netanyahu of a major Hamas offensive approximately one and a half weeks before the October 7 attacks. According to the report, the two leaders spoke for 45 minutes, during which the UAE president warned that Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar planned an operation that could destabilize the entire Middle East. The report further alleges that Netanyahu did not inform the Israeli security apparatus about this conversation.

The Prime Minister's Office has denied the claims, stating that the story is completely fabricated. Officials asserted that no communication occurred between Netanyahu and the UAE from early September 2023 until October 7, citing call logs and office entry records as evidence. The Prime Minister's Office described the report as a sinister plot timed for the upcoming legislative elections. In response, Haaretz stated that it stands by its reporting.

Other regional and international reactions have emerged. Sources within the Biden administration told The Jerusalem Post that they were unaware of any specific warning from the UAE to Netanyahu before the massacre. Meanwhile, the UAE Foreign Ministry stated that it has maintained open lines of communication with Israel and shares relevant intelligence. The Prime Minister's Office also shifted blame for the October 7 failure toward security chiefs Ronen Bar and Herzi Halevi, claiming they saw signs of the attack hours before it began but failed to inform the Prime Minister in time.

How each side framed it

Left
Framed the event as an exposé of criminal negligence and a betrayal by the Prime Minister.
Centre-left
Detailed the specific contents of the alleged warning and the context of the upcoming elections.
Centre
Presented the report as a scandal breaking during a period of political instability for Netanyahu.
Centre-right
Focused on the denials from the Biden administration and the official rebuttals from the Prime Minister's Office.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.