the news now
This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

New Mexico Court Orders Meta to Pay $567 Million for Youth Mental Health Fund

4 sources across 4 countries · Bangladesh · Brazil · Philippines · United States

Who reported this

  • The Daily Star Bangladesh · Centre · Mediaworld Ltd
  • CNN Brasil Brazil · Centre · Rubens Menin (MRV)
  • Rappler Philippines · Centre-left · Rappler Inc, staff-held
  • Ars Technica United States · Centre · Conde Nast (Advance Publications)

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

A New Mexico state court has ordered Meta to pay $567 million into a fund for teen mental health prevention and treatment. Judge Bryan Biedscheid ruled that the company created a public nuisance by designing platforms that addicted young users and failed to protect children from sexual exploitation. This ruling follows an earlier phase of the case where a jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million for violating consumer protection laws and misleading parents about app safety. Combined, the penalties total $942 million.

In addition to the financial penalties, the judge ordered Meta to implement specific changes for users in New Mexico. These include more stringent age verification, restricting users under 18 to 90 hours of use per month, and disabling push notifications during school hours and overnight. The court also mandated that Meta ban sexualized chatbot interactions with minors, blur images suspected of containing nudity, and delete accounts and personal information for users under 13. However, the judge rejected requests to modify Meta's algorithms or features like infinite scroll and autoplay, citing potential First Amendment and Section 230 concerns.

Meta has stated that the claims misrepresent the facts and announced its intention to appeal the ruling. The company argued that its platforms are not the only ones used by youth and pointed to its existing investments in safety tools. New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez described the decision as a blueprint for other governments seeking to force changes on social media platforms through the courts. This case occurs amid a broader wave of litigation involving dozens of states and school districts regarding youth mental health and safety.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
This framing emphasized the potential for the ruling to serve as a precedent for other states and detailed the specific platform restrictions.
Centre
These reports focused on the legal specifics of the ruling and the financial totals.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.