the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Presidency Criticizes Atiku Abubakar Over Proposal to Restore Petrol Subsidy

2 sources · Nigeria

Who reported this

  • Premium Times Nigeria · Centre · Premium Times Services Ltd
  • TheCable Nigeria · Centre · Cable Newspaper Ltd

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Every source for this story reports from Nigeria.

Every outlet covering this story shares the same political lean; read with that in mind.

Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has stated that he will restore the petrol subsidy if elected president in 2027. During an interview on Wednesday, Atiku questioned the accounting of funds saved from the subsidy removal, suggesting that the money intended for poverty reduction and education may have been stolen. He argued that the removal would have been justified if savings were channeled into development projects, security, and youth opportunities. Atiku added that he would require those who stole the money to refund it.

Presidential spokesman Bayo Onanuga criticized the proposal, accusing Atiku of being desperate for power and opportunistically reversing his previous stance on subsidy removal. Onanuga described the subsidy regime as wasteful and corruption ridden, noting that the Petroleum Industry Act made the subsidy illegal as of June 2023. He further disputed Atiku's claims regarding a subsidy windfall, stating that no such funds exist in the treasury.

While both reports are from center leaning outlets, they emphasize different aspects of the event. One focuses on Atiku's justification for the policy and the broader economic context of the subsidy removal, while the other focuses on the presidency's condemnation of Atiku's shift in economic doctrine.

How each side framed it

Centre
The center leaning outlets provided a balance between Atiku's policy proposal and the presidency's critical response.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.