the news now
This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Prime Minister Andy Burnham to Decide on Controversial North Sea Oil and Gas Developments

2 sources · United Kingdom

Who reported this

  • The Independent United Kingdom · Centre-left · Sultan Muhammad Abuljadayel and Evgeny Lebedev
  • Sky News United Kingdom · Centre · Comcast

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Every source for this story reports from United Kingdom.

Prime Minister Andy Burnham is preparing to decide whether to approve two North Sea energy developments: the Rosebank oil field and the Jackdaw gas field. A public consultation on the Rosebank project, which is the largest undeveloped oil field in the UK, recently closed. These projects were previously approved by the Conservative government, but those decisions were overturned following a legal challenge by Greenpeace.

Mr. Burnham has stated he will take a pragmatic approach to North Sea oil. In a phone call with US President Donald Trump, he suggested that future drilling is possible, noting that the resource exists while people are struggling.

Supporters of the developments, including the oil and gas industry, opposition politicians, and President Trump, argue that approval would protect jobs and lower household energy bills. Scottish MP Graeme Downie stated that failing to proceed would cause investment to leave the UK and jobs to disappear.

Conversely, environmental groups and some politicians oppose the plans. Stop Climate Chaos Scotland warned that carbon emissions from the projects could lead to thousands of excess heat deaths by the end of the century. Representatives from WWF Scotland and Greenpeace UK argued that the developments would accelerate climate change without lowering energy bills, as much of the oil would likely be exported. Green leader Zack Polanski described the potential approval as a dereliction of duty, claiming the projects would primarily benefit fossil fuel company profits rather than the economy.

Reporting on the event differs by political lean. Center leaning coverage frames the situation as a critical life and death decision for the energy industry. Center left leaning coverage focuses more heavily on the pressure from environmental campaigners and the potential climate impacts.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
Emphasized the conflict between pragmatic energy needs and the warnings of environmental activists.
Centre
Framed the decision as a critical turning point for the survival of the North Sea energy industry.

Sources

90% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.