the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

Proposed Brazilian Law Would Ban Intelligence Reports in Criminal Cases

2 sources · Brazil

Who reported this

  • UOL Brazil · Centre-left · Grupo Folha
  • Folha de S.Paulo Brazil · Centre · Grupo Folha (Frias family)

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Every source for this story reports from Brazil.

A bill currently stalled in the Brazilian Senate since July seeks to prohibit the use of intelligence reports in criminal proceedings. The project, authored by Senator Nelsinho Trad, forbids intelligence agencies from conducting evidentiary diligences for the purpose of criminal prosecution. Senator Trad justified the proposal by stating that intelligence activities are intended to provide data for decision making processes, whereas criminal investigations are designed to identify the authorship and materiality of crimes.

If the law were already in effect, a Federal Police report used by Supreme Court Minister Alexandre de Moraes against Minister André Mendonça would be inadmissible in the inquiry. The proposal reflects concerns among intelligence professionals, including those at the Brazilian Intelligence Agency (Abin), who argue that intelligence work has been banalized. These officials contend that intelligence should be reserved for strategic cases such as sabotage, violent extremism, and external threats, and that such reports should remain strictly confidential rather than being used to produce evidence against individuals.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
The outlet presented the bill as a regulatory distinction between intelligence gathering and criminal investigation.
Centre
The outlet presented the bill as a regulatory distinction between intelligence gathering and criminal investigation.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.