the news now
This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Russia's Supreme Court Bars Yabloko Anti War Party from Parliamentary Elections

12 sources across 9 countries · 1 of them is linked to a state

Who reported this

  • Der Spiegel Germany · Centre-left · ~50% staff-owned
  • Deutsche Welle Germany · Centre · Public · German federal public-law corporation
  • Frankfurter Allgemeine Germany · Centre-right · FAZIT-Stiftung (foundation)
  • Meduza Latvia · Centre-left · Crowdfunded; exiled Russian newsroom
  • Novaya Gazeta Europe Latvia · Centre-left · Crowdfunded; exiled Russian newsroom
  • Folha de S.Paulo Brazil · Centre · Grupo Folha (Frias family)
  • South China Morning Post Hong Kong · Centre-right · Alibaba Group
  • Telex Hungary · Centre · Reader-funded, staff-owned
  • Al Jazeera Qatar · Centre-left · State-affiliated · Qatari government funded
  • Business Day South Africa · Centre-right · Arena Holdings (Lebashe Investment Group)
  • Kyiv Independent Ukraine · Centre · Reader-funded, journalist-owned
  • Reuters United Kingdom · Centre · Thomson Reuters Corporation

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Russia's Supreme Court on Monday barred the liberal Yabloko party from participating in the parliamentary elections scheduled for September. The ruling follows a lawsuit filed by the nationalist pro Kremlin party Rodina. Yabloko was the only officially registered party in Russia that campaigned on a platform calling for an immediate ceasefire and the end of the war in Ukraine. The party's platform, described as one of the shortest in its history, used the slogan: For Peace and Freedom! For a Life Without Fear!

Rodina alleged that Yabloko violated campaign financing laws and received undeclared support from Western sources. Other accusations included copyright violations for using Soviet songs and images, as well as the use of an AI generated image from ChatGPT. Yabloko leader Nikolai Rybakov denied these allegations, calling the case an unconstitutional attack on freedom of thought. The party announced its intention to appeal the decision.

Following the ruling, several hundred supporters, many of them young people, gathered outside the court in Moscow. Many carried apples, which are the symbol of the party. Some witnesses reported that police dispersed the crowd by threatening them with forced enlistment to fight in Ukraine.

While Yabloko has not won a seat in the federal State Duma since 2003, recent reports indicate a surge in interest. Some sources state the party was polling around 3 percent, while others suggest it reached as high as 5 or 6 percent. The party also received public support from exiled opposition figures, including Yulia Navalnaya, the widow of Alexei Navalny.

Outlets with different political leanings interpreted the Kremlin's motives differently. Center left sources framed the initial registration of Yabloko as a strategic move by the Kremlin to bleed protest votes or act as a safety valve for public dissatisfaction before the party's polling became too high. Center and center right sources focused on the decision as a consolidation of political repression and a narrowing of the space for legal dissent in Russia.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
Suggested the Kremlin initially allowed the party to run to manage protest votes before removing them as polling rose.
Centre
Framed the event as a consolidation of political repression and the removal of the last legal anti war voice.
Centre-right
Highlighted the move as a sign of the authorities' intolerance of anti war views and the narrowing of political space.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.