the news now
This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Russian Supreme Court Disqualifies Anti-War Party Jabloko from Elections

4 sources across 3 countries · Germany · Italy · Latvia

Who reported this

  • Sueddeutsche Zeitung Germany · Centre-left · Sudwestdeutsche Medien Holding
  • Frankfurter Allgemeine Germany · Centre-right · FAZIT-Stiftung (foundation)
  • Corriere della Sera Italy · Centre-right · RCS MediaGroup (Cairo Communication)
  • Novaya Gazeta Europe Latvia · Centre-left · Crowdfunded; exiled Russian newsroom

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Russia's Supreme Court has excluded the Jabloko party from the proportional representation lists for the upcoming September elections. Jabloko is described by multiple reports as the only remaining anti-war party in Russia. The court's decision followed an eight hour session and cited allegations of foreign funding, a claim the party has denied. The disqualification comes amid a broader crackdown on the party, including the sentencing of its deputy chief to seven years in a labor camp and the exclusion of party president Nikolai Rybakov due to a past social media post featuring Alexei Navalny.

Protests occurred outside the court building in Moscow, where young demonstrators gathered with apple symbols and anti-war slogans. While some reports indicate that independent polls showed Jabloko's support rising to 13 or 14 percent, other perspectives suggest the party does not represent a majority of Russians. The party remains eligible for single-member district seats, though observers note this offers little practical chance of success compared to the proportional lists.

Outlets with a center-left lean frame the event as a desperate move by the Kremlin to silence a peace movement that resonates with a population tired of war. In contrast, center-right outlets frame the event as a symptom of a regime that views any uncontrolled social movement as a threat to its stability, regardless of whether that movement holds a majority of public support.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
They framed the disqualification as a reaction to genuine public desire for peace and a failure of state propaganda.
Centre-right
They framed the event as a calculated move by an authoritarian regime to eliminate any uncontrolled political risk.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.